The Type field for Christian History Magazine is wrongly tagged as Monograph, but it is a Journal.
Harry, have you seen the wiki page for these necessary corrections: http://wiki.logos.com/Metadata_correction_proposals
CHM is listed there to be fixed and named magazine, which it is (rather than a journal)
That is how Discipleship Journal is tagged (in spite of being self-named a journal). It makes sense for CHM to be handled the same way, Not sure why they just didn't choose 'Periodical' ans a Type and not have to decide which to call it. Monograph it is not.
Yes, Periodical would be a more proper tag in library-speak for both journals and magazines.
A monograph is, by definition, a work created by a single author (mono = Greek for "only"). So they have a lot of books that are collections of essays that are misclassified as well.
have you seen the wiki page for these necessary corrections: http://wiki.logos.com/Metadata_correction_proposals CHM is listed there to be fixed and named magazine, which it is (rather than a journal)
have you seen the wiki page for these necessary corrections: http://wiki.logos.com/Metadata_correction_proposals
A major step in the right direction. These types need to be consistent if dynamic collections are to be useful and as our libraries continue to grow to a potentially unmanageable size.
Available Now
Build your biblical library with a new trusted commentary or resource every month. Yours to keep forever.
