Cannot use Anderson-Forbes Hebrew Morphology with ESV

I am puzzled why I cannot use Anderson-Forbes Hebrew Morphology with ESV. Repeatedly in the Learn to use Hebrew videos that I purchased it is demonstrated that this feature is available. When I go to use it I am forced to use Logos Hebrew Morphology which does not seem to be as sophisticated. I see the richness of the former as a tool only to discover that I am not allowed to use it with visual filters. Also, when I choose all resources in visual filters, which does allow the Anderson-Forbes Hebrew Morphology option, it still does not work.

Paul J. Dousi

paul@yfmatters.com

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

MJ. Smith

Welcome to the forums. Which base package do you own?

Paul Dousi

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/573784#Comment_573784

I own Logos 5 Minimal Crossgrade It appears as an option in the package.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/573786#Comment_573786

I can't reproduce your problem; What are you trying to see?

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/573786#Comment_573786

HI Paul - and welcome to the forums.

Is your issue specifically with the use of Visual Filters?

If so this is due to a change in Logos 5 - please see http://community.logos.com/forums/t/58739.aspx (and others) for some context

Graham

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/573799#Comment_573799

Thanks Graham ... I hadn't put it together

Paul Dousi

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/573799#Comment_573799

Hi Graham,

Thank you for your response. Nevertheless, I am still baffled as to why in using visual filters A-F Hebrew Morphology has been replaced by Logos Hebrew Morphology. In watching the Hebrew noun videos it is demonstrated that the A-F includes part of speech, noun subclass,noun family, number, gender, state, definiteness, and derivational suffix. Whereas Logos Hebrew Morphology includes part of speech, noun type, gender, number, state and ending type, It seems to me if Logos 5 is an upgrade from Logos 4 that it would at least maintain if not advance in its feature. LHM seems to be a down grade from A-F. Any ideas why this was changed and if A-F will be restored or LHM improved?

Paul J. Dousi

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/574035#Comment_574035

Hi Paul

Any ideas why this was changed

A Logos employee provided some context at http://community.logos.com/forums/p/67165/468276.aspx#468276

and if A-F will be restored or LHM improved?

http://community.logos.com/forums/t/68503.aspx says the LHB tagging will continue to improve but I haven't seen any details regarding what those improvements will be or make possible.

Graham