Thanks to Niko and MJ, I'm definitely 'in'.
https://www.logos.com/product/41957/the-antioch-bible
For anyone trying to track down info (trying Antioch Bible will get you a boatload of churches!):
Google: "antioch Bible" -church (or similar though google still delivers 'Antioch')
As MJ notes above, they're pricey. And as the link below shows, even the discounted pre-pub is pricey relative to Logos:
http://biblereadersmuseum.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-antioch-bible.html (1 1/2 years ago)
And for a taste of an interesting contributor-ish (of course you already know George Kraz for sure):
https://cua.academia.edu/MorganReed
As you'll note on the Amazon query, this is NOT the whole Peshitta; they're being published one/two at a time.
Sign up for sure ... another set of original language texts 'you wish you'd bought' later on.
(If you're wondering, our present Peshitta translation is a bit dated and also un-noted).
Which Peshitta translation is that?
Hmmm ... my face is red (all that AZ sun). NT! I'd forgotten the lengthy months I'd tried to find a decent OT version (english)! But the NT version is indeed note-less (the key piece of info for non-syriac-ers).
Lamsa Bible
1957 Lamsa Translation
The Bible text designated Lamsa is from The Holy Bible From the Ancient Eastern Text: George M. Lamsa's Translations From the Aramaic of the Peshitta. Copyright (c) 1933, 1939, 1940, and 1957 by A. J. Holman Company. Copyright (c) renewed 1985 by Nina Shabaz. The electronic text is copyright 1999 by Larry Nelson. Published by arrangement with HarperCollins Publishers Inc. All rights reserved. Used by permission.
I have it in Online Bible, but not sure where else it is available in the Bible Software.
-Dan
Dan ... just my own opinion (not counting a boatload elsewhere) ... Antioch would be a first. I actually bought Lamsa and did a detailed analysis on it. I continued the search.
[Y][Y][Y][Y][Y][Y]