The parsing info for Greek verbs in the Perseus is full of errors

Lars Kierspel

Since the NT does not have any aorist or perfect forms of εἰμί, I thought to look for these in the Perseus collection. After typing in the search command for aorist forms of εἰμί (lemma:εἰμί@VA), the results include future infinitives (ἔσεσθαι) as well as present imperatives (ἔστω)! So, is my morphology off or is Logos not there yet regarding the morphological analysis of the Perseus texts? 

Mark Barnes

Perseus morphology was added automatically, and isn't human edited. Where the specific morphology of a word is ambiguous, then the word is tagged with all compatible morphologies.

As a consequence, ἔσεσθαι is tagged with both εἰσίημι@VAMN and εἰμί@VFMN. Unfortunately, the search sees that there is both an εἰμί and an aorist in the same interlinear cell, and returns the result, even both the aorist is actually linked with a different lemma.