Not that I mind the improvements - I really like some of them but:
1. I had a collection of sermons and homilies that I used as a collection in the passage guide. With your new sermon feature I would like the metadata to tell me what is tagged for appearing in the sermon section so that I can exclude them from my collection i.e. not have to look at things twice.
2. I had made a clippings file of outlines - incomplete but a decent start. And I had a collection of commentaries that included outlines. With the relatively new outline section, metadata to tell me what was already included so I could exclude and/or remove it would be very useful.
3. In general, it would be good to have metadata telling me what sections each resource fills automatically so that I can build special collections to show any items I wouldn't otherwise see. Especially in some of the topic areas the list of resources scanned is anything but obvious.
4. When I did outlines manually, I was also interested in other literary structures - chiasm, inclusio, parallel, etc. I would love to see a new section similar to the outline section for this information.
5. It's not that I don't appreciate your old tried-and-true genre classification. It's just that you never been able to give me definitions for your categories. It would be nice if genre information could be pulled from our commentaries and monographs to supplement your coding. Or at an absolute minimum, supplement with the Andersen-Forbes genres.
6. I appreciate the text comparison tool ... but as my collection of creeds, confessions and earch church fathers grow, I would love to be able to apply this tool more broadly.
