When is an exegetical commentary not a commentary?

Stephen Steele

I was glad to see 2 more volumes from Classic Commentary favourite John Brown just downloaded as part of Classic Commentaries and Studies in the Gospels and Acts.

However the product description states:

"the texts of Jesus’ words are given along with extensive exegetical commentary from the renowned pastor and scholar John Brown."

Is it too much to ask that these 2 volumes be treated as Commentaries rather than Monographs by Logos so that they appear under 'Commentaries' in Passage Guide? Eg if I was searching for commentaries on Luke 11:37-54 I would expect the exposition below to appear under 'Commentaries' - but it doesn't.

Some of the collection are clearly Studies rather than Commentaries - eg Bruce on Miracles:

But if something is an exposition of a text (or texts) can we have it treated as a commentary please?

MJ. Smith

But if something is an exposition of a text (or texts) can we have it treated as a commentary please?

I didn't purchase this item so I can't check but there are a number of requirements that need to be met for a resource to work correctly as a commentary. As a rough estimate, the resource should be sequential and have fairly comprehensive coverage to work well ... at least that it what I'd gleaned from resources that malfunction as commentaries.