As I stated, is it possible?
Last month, I purchased many books from Amazon kindle Ebooks.
Even if I have a kindle device, I want to put them all to my logos library.
Is anyone familiar in this situation? and know how to handle this?
Thanks!
There is no way to do that. Amazon Kindle books have DRM (digital rights management) and cannot be exported to other formats. There might be some (illegal) ways of breaking the DRM and getting it into a Word document, but I wouldn't know about those, and I wouldn't recommend that anyway. If you had it as a Word document, you could compile it to a Logos Personal Book.
It is, however, possible to go the other way, to send a Logos book to Kindle.
Maybe someday Logos and Amazon will get together so that Logos can allow importing Amazon Kindle's .mobi format books directly, but I wouldn't hold my breath.
im new here! can normal pdfs be imported or unlocked ebooks?I use calibre which is set to remove drm on imported books on auto, not to distribute lol but makes it more usable for me.Once all is in calibre i can use in any ebook system within reason.so if logos can import I would be interested ;-)
welcome! [:)]
to import books, they MUST be word .docx files. See the wiki article on personal books.
Once all is in calibre i can use in any ebook system within reason.
You can use Calibre to export to HTML. Import that into Word, and save as a .docx and you can then import that to Logos as a personal book.
Once all is in calibre i can use in any ebook system within reason. You can use Calibre to export to HTML. Import that into Word, and save as a .docx and you can then import that to Logos as a personal book.
Or use Calibre to export to RTF, but you lose internal links, etc. completely.
If you just want the text, Calibre can export easily. If you want internal links, Logos Table of Contents, etc., you're in for a lot of work in MS Word...
This is what I normally do... but why this instead of Mark's suggestion of HTML?
Or use Calibre to export to RTF, but you lose internal links, etc. completely. This is what I normally do... but why this instead of Mark's suggestion of HTML?
I meant it as "here's another option", not "do this instead". It is the most straightforward if all you want is the formatted text. If you want footnotes, etc., to come through, HTML is definitely a better option.
Available Now
Build your biblical library with a new trusted commentary or resource every month. Yours to keep forever.
