No "Visualizations" reported in Exegetical Guide for John 1:1

This is with 6.0b RC 1 on Windows 8.1

As shown below if I run an EG on John 1:1 the section on Visualizations returns empty - even though there are visualizations for that verse

If I run the guide on John 1:1-2 I get the expected set of visualizations

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Dylan Rondeau

Hmm, I'm not sure what's wrong with your install, as I'm getting correct results:

I don't know if indexing might affect this? (I don't think it would, but it might)

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/682966#Comment_682966

Hmm, I'm not sure what's wrong with your install, as I'm getting correct results:

Thanks Dylan

I checked further and found I had an old EG on that verse which was saved.

I deleted that EG and visualisations appeared in the new one.

Don't claim to understand why!!

Dylan Rondeau

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/682977#Comment_682977

I deleted that EG and visualisations appeared in the new one.

Don't claim to understand why!!

Glad it's working! I saw that you had a saved one, and thought that might be relevant, but I couldn't really justify why it would be. [:^)]

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/682977#Comment_682977

I checked further and found I had an old EG on that verse which was saved.

I deleted that EG and visualisations appeared in the new one.

Saved ones reflect the template or results available at the time. Deleting forces the new report to use whatever template/data is currently available

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/683258#Comment_683258

One can also refresh a section or the whole guide to verify this is not the issue.

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/683258#Comment_683258

Saved ones reflect the template or results available at the time

Thanks, Dave, that's helpful.

So does this suggest that when I saved the guide I didn't have any visualisation resources relevant to that verse in my library? Or could there be another explanation?

Dave Hooton

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/683270#Comment_683270

Or it was buggy at the time.