Suggestion: Could we have more sub-levels in the workflow editor?

I'm in favor of this but after quite a bit of other critical functionality is added (e.g. specifying a resource for the read step, using the key as a parameter in links, multiple notes, specifying commentary collections, etc...)

Dave Couch

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1006695#Comment_1006695

[Y]

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1006695#Comment_1006695

I'm in favor of this but after quite a bit of other critical functionality is added (e.g. specifying a resource for the read step, using the key as a parameter in links, multiple notes, specifying commentary collections, etc...)

I think I would agree with that[:)]

David Thomas

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1006695#Comment_1006695

I'm in favor of this but after quite a bit of other critical functionality is added (e.g. specifying a resource for the read step, using the key as a parameter in links, multiple notes, specifying commentary collections, etc...)

[Y] yes, I need to break down step 5. Consult Commentaries into my collections and some of those collections need to be inserted into other parts of the workflow - i.e. background commentaries needs to be part of "3.1 Examine the Cultural Context" and https://www.logos.com/product/5321/commentary-on-the-new-testament-use-of-the-old-testament needs to be part of "4. Identify Important Cross Reference

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1006695#Comment_1006695

I'm in favor of this but after quite a bit of other critical functionality is added (e.g. specifying a resource for the read step, using the key as a parameter in links, multiple notes, specifying commentary collections, etc...)

You left out the multiple passages and liturgical date/service key ...and passing a search key to the search should be fairly high.