DATA BUG? Sean - missing tagging?

Normally all references via antecedents and/or deixis are coded in the text. Therefore, when I selected "country of the Gerasenes" in Mark 5:2 NRSV, I was unsure whether you would have treated it as a single lexical unit or treated it as a linguistic chunk. However, I did expect to see a tag for Gerasenes (nation) and a link to the Atlas. Nope and Nope. Note "sea" in the same verse works as I would expect.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

MJ. Smith

bump 12

Philana R. Crouch

Hey MJ,

I let the team who does the tagging know about this bug. They've put it on their list.

Sean Boisen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1078406#Comment_1078406

MJ, it looks to me like we've not annotated referents for these (AREA "of" (PLACE)) constructions: compare Mark 1:5 ("the country of Judea"), Mark 1:28 ("the surrounding region of Galilee"), etc. We have annotated referents for a bare noun: Mark 5:10 ("the country" = Gerasenes), 5:14 ("the city" = Gadara). So i think this was intentional rather than accidental, though I no longer recall what the rationale may have been.