Group 9 Proposed:
- Scrivener’s 1881 Textus Receptus. 1995. electronic ed. Oak Harbor: Logos Research Systems.
- Scrivener’s Textus Receptus (1894): With Morphology. 2002. Bellingham, WA: Logos Bible Software.
Group 10 Proposed:
- Aland, Kurt, Barbara Aland, Johannes Karavidopoulos, et al. 2012. Novum Testamentum Graece. 28th Edition. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.
- Nestle, Eberhard, and Erwin Nestle. 2012. Nestle-Aland: Novum Testamentum Graece. 28. revidierte Auflage. eds. Barbara Aland et al. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft.
Given the contents of the 7 groups that are handled as equivalents, I don't understand why the Textus Receptus is not.
