N.T. Wright's book Justification: God's Plan and Paul's Vision is incorrectly tagged with the Factbook entry for John Piper.
Perhaps the tag is due to Wright being in dialogue with Piper's ideas, in this book?
These two are well known for interacting on this topic.
Perhaps the tag is due to Wright being in dialogue with Piper's ideas, in this book? These two are well known for interacting on this topic.
So that tag is for the purposes of identifying a book about John Piper's views? I thought that tag was so that it showed up in the factbook entry for the author, in this case N.T. Wright. Maybe I'm wrong on how the factbook tags work. [shrug]
Maybe I'm wrong on how the factbook tags work. [shrug]
Factbook tags work like all other tags -- they are concerned with all sorts of relationships: authorship, topical, ...
Shouldn't both be tagged in this instance if your reasoning, which is sound, is correct.
It's more like "note to John Piper: read this book. You'll learn somethin'." [;)][:P]
I was scratching my head on this one for a bit. The book is in response to John Piper but certainly not about John Piper.Then I noticed that lcsh subjects referenced John Piper and much of initial data dump leveraged Library of Congress subjects.For now I removed it but I could be convinced otherwise.
much of initial data dump leveraged Library of Congress subjects.
That explains most of the garbage Factbook tags I've come across so far.
