I bought this in print/leather, and I also have the free Accordance version. Would love to see it in Logos as well. Looks like a solid translation.
Suggestion: Legacy Standard Bible
I would love to see this in logos in 2021 upon its release!
What is the LSB?
The Legacy Standard Bible (LSB) is a translation that—at its core—seeks to be a window into the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek. By translating individual words as consistently as possible within their various nuances, it allows the reader to discern what God originally wrote and know the author’s intent. In this way, the LSB seeks to be an improvement upon the NASB, while simultaneously preserving its faithful legacy.
Is the LSB a new translation?
The Legacy Standard Bible is a direct update of the NASB 1995 edition and fundamentally endeavors to uphold it. The translators went back to the original Hebrew, Aramaic, and Greek of every verse in order to double check its accuracy. Any changes made strictly revolved around providing greater consistency in word usage, accuracy in grammatical structure, and tightening phrasing.
Sometimes these changes will incorporate what was found in the earlier NASB ’77 edition. However, if no update was needed, then the text was left as originally translated by the NASB ’95. Thus, as opposed to a brand new translation, the LSB is truly designed to be a legacy edition. It is a version that honors and upholds the NASB tradition, and endeavors to more fully implement its translation philosophy.
How is the LSB different from the NASB ‘95?
While the Legacy Standard Bible sought to uphold the NASB 95, it has several key distinctions:
- The recovery of God’s name, Yahweh in the OT, and slave for the Greek term doulos in the NT.
- The change of certain words and phrases in order to ensure that English words consistently matched their original language counterparts, and that the phrasing matched the grammar of the original language.
- The usage of weights, measurements, and currency as they’re found in the original writing. Because this translation is designed to bring the reader to what was originally written, the LSB maintains the unit of measurement that the Scripture uses. For clarity, conversions into both American and metric units are provided in the notes for measurements. This allows for the LSB to serve the entire English-speaking world by not choosing one country’s unit of measurement or currency over another. It also preserves any exegetical significance of the way the measurements were originally expressed.
Comments
It's not the same as having it in Logos, but you can access both Testaments online pretty easily via https://read.lsbible.org/. I discovered that via a Shepherd's Conference update at the end of last month (Nov).
In addition, they're providing sporadic updates about progress on the project (mainly the print copies, some news about electronic versions) via a mailing list. You can sign up in the footer on their website: https://lsbible.org/.
I am not a huge fan of Accordance but I may have to move back for LSB for a bit.
I hope it comes out here soon.
I really dislike having two Bible softwares running but am for LSB stuff. It is becoming our pulpit reading and preaching BIble. Please prioritize this very highly
Jacob Hantla
Pastor/Elder, Grace Bible Church
gbcaz.org
Here's an update from the publisher I received today:
We are done with the work on the cross references, footnotes and Strong’s numbers that are included in the master database for the LSB. A meta-data company will filter through the file and then minor updates will occur. After that work is completed we will have a file to begin typesetting reference editions and a file that can be used for programmers to begin their work on digital editions. We expect several of the Bible software apps and websites to begin making the LSB available by the end of the first quarter of 2022.
For the time being I have this in my browser and I am going to see about making a link in L9
The mind of man is the mill of God, not to grind chaff, but wheat. Thomas Manton | Study hard, for the well is deep, and our brains are shallow. Richard Baxter
For the time being I have this in my browser and I am going to see about making a link in L9
Surprised to see Lockman listed at the bottom of the page. I thought this was a Masters Seminary project.
ASUS ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti
"The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not." Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.
The LSB website posted something recently:
Will the LSB be available on mobile apps, Bible software platforms, and online?
As the OP, I 100% agree, but it is important to note that it just came out today as a full digital file using their app. As of now, only Accordance has it because they took up the LSB first (which either Logos missed an amazing opportunity or were never asked).
Now that it is available in the wild, per se, hopefully it will trickle out to other online bible retailers.
You can read it online at https://read.lsbible.org/
OR download the Accordance app and read it on your phone. I don't use Accordance but I have to have it to read in their app. You don't need an account to use it (NOR am I promoting it).
http://www.accordancebible.com/LSB/
Per their FAQ
It's troubling that we don't even see the LSB in pre-pub yet for Logos even though a certain competitor just completed the whole LSB with Strong's numbers within the past week or so. It automatically updated for me in said competitor's software from NT-only to now include the whole bible.
Can Logos please at least get the text out? We know that Logos' tagging takes longer since Logos does a lot more tagging. I don't want to keep having to open a certain competitor's software when I want to read/compare the LSB.
Relax, that's not the final digital file that will be made available to Bible software companies, including Accordance. That's a stand-alone app and is not the same as the final product that will be available to Logos and Accordance at the same time.
The version I'm referring to is not in the stand-alone app but actually available in the competitor's bible software. I just used it yesterday on my laptop. I don't have the stand-alone app. They initially made the NT w/ Strong's numbers available for (free) download from their store. They recently updated their version to include the whole bible with Strong's numbers. I just looked at their store, they still have the LSB available for free to be downloaded into their software, only now they include both old and new testaments.
Hello Kiyah, May I please ask where I can go and download that software to use on my laptop?
Although the bible is free, the competitor's (MacOS/Windows) software is not. I'm trying not to violate Forum guidelines by promoting a competitor's non-free product. You'd have to buy their bible software and then "purchase" their free version of the LSB in order to be able to use it on your laptop.
I frankly don't see what advantage there is to the LSB over the NASB95. I like the NASB for its literalness, but the deal-clincher is that it has marginal notes that amp up the literalness even more. For instance, while the NASB and the LSB both have "lights" in Gen. 1:14, the NASB has "luminaries" in the margin, which i much prefer simply because it is more accurate. Why should I switch to a version that is simply less of what I like about the original?
ASUS ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti
"The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not." Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.
The LSB I have downloaded on my phone has a footnote on gen 1:14 that reads, “Or luminaries, light-bearers”
I frankly don't see what advantage there is to the LSB over the NASB95. I like the NASB for its literalness, but the deal-clincher is that it has marginal notes that amp up the literalness even more. For instance, while the NASB and the LSB both have "lights" in Gen. 1:14, the NASB has "luminaries" in the margin, which i much prefer simply because it is more accurate. Why should I switch to a version that is simply less of what I like about the original?
If you run a visual filter on the NASB95 that turns doulos into slave and YHWH into Yahweh, you have the LSB without spending any additional money.
Using Logos as a pastor, seminary professor, and Tyndale author
I frankly don't see what advantage there is to the LSB over the NASB95. I like the NASB for its literalness, but the deal-clincher is that it has marginal notes that amp up the literalness even more. For instance, while the NASB and the LSB both have "lights" in Gen. 1:14, the NASB has "luminaries" in the margin, which i much prefer simply because it is more accurate. Why should I switch to a version that is simply less of what I like about the original?
If you run a visual filter on the NASB95 that turns doulos into slave and YHWH into Yahweh, you have the LSB without spending any additional money.
Using Logos as a pastor, seminary professor, and Tyndale author
You should watch the videos discussing the translation philosophy of the LSB on their website. One translation priority is to make the original language apparent in the translation by using the same word to translate it if doing so can preseve the meaning. This is why light not luminaries. If you don’t like this approach, fine. But don’t falsely claim it is a bad translation choice while ignoring the reasons for it. This is disingenuous
You should watch the videos discussing the translation philosophy of the LSB on their website. One translation priority is to make the original language apparent in the translation by using the same word to translate it if doing so can preseve the meaning. This is why light not luminaries. If you don’t like this approach, fine. But don’t falsely claim it is a bad translation choice while ignoring the reasons for it. This is disingenuous
You should watch the videos discussing the translation philosophy of the LSB on their website. One translation priority is to make the original language apparent in the translation by using the same word to translate it if doing so can preseve the meaning. This is why light not luminaries. If you don’t like this approach, fine. But don’t falsely claim it is a bad translation choice while ignoring the reasons for it. This is disingenuous
The LSB is available for pre-order!
The LSB is available for pre-order!
ordered
Jacob Hantla
Pastor/Elder, Grace Bible Church
gbcaz.org
The LSB is available for pre-order!
ordered
Jacob Hantla
Pastor/Elder, Grace Bible Church
gbcaz.org
You should watch the videos discussing the translation philosophy of the LSB on their website. One translation priority is to make the original language apparent in the translation by using the same word to translate it if doing so can preseve the meaning. This is why light not luminaries. If you don’t like this approach, fine. But don’t falsely claim it is a bad translation choice while ignoring the reasons for it. This is disingenuous
Yeah...no. The Hebrew word for "light" is 'ohr, as found twice in Gen. 1:3. The word translated "light" in Gen. 1:14-16 is maa'ohr, and thus, not the same word. Related, but not the same. "A light" produces "light", so the sun is a light. The moon is not, although it does reflect light, providing illumination. The sun and stars are lights; the moon is not--but all produce illumination, whether directly or by reflection, and so "luminaries" is the better and more accurate choice. Nothing disingenuous at all.
ASUS ProArt x570s Creator, AMD R9 5950x, HyperX 64gb 3600 RAM, ASUS Strix RTX 2080 ti
"The Unbelievable Work...believe it or not." Little children...Biblical prophecy is not Christianity's friend.