Help needed understanding Source Criticism data

Verbum coding

Andersen-Forbes coding

The red arrow on the first image (Logos/Verbum dataset) has segments coded with two tags (see Information column) which results in mixed color highlighting. The second image is the Andersen-Forbes coding which has no mixed tagging. I realize that the Andersen-Forbes coding is much older in computer time but I don't know (and probably wouldn't know) of any major changes that would explain the difference in coding. Why do they differ -- different philosophy of showing ambiguities? advances in theories? side effect of Hebrew vs. English tagging? error in tagging?

Find more posts tagged with

Desktop App

Comments

MJ. Smith

bumping in hopes of getting a response either from Logos or from the forums

Jimmy Parks

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1262903#Comment_1262903

There are two different datasets that are being used here. Anderson Forbes includes Eissfeldt's Hexateuch, and Logos created a stand alone data-set using this same resource (https://archive.org/details/hexateuchsynopse00eiss/page/n3/mode/2up)

It looks like when I created the stand alone data-set, I didn't realize that the P source starting in Gen 2, didn't go to the end of verse 4. I'll update the annotation.

Thank you for pointing this out.

Jimmy Parks

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1262903#Comment_1262903

This issue has been fixed. The update should be shipped in the next cycle of updates.