In the passage posted, click on the Strong's number for cities, and see what comes up. I'm not getting the proper word meaning but something altogether different. Is this a glitch or is there something else that I'm missing?
The reference shows that it is Strong’s 5895 for me.
(Showing NIV) it seems that the surface text reads similar ayarim and this text and even the lemma might be similar if looking at the Hebrew and taking away the vocalization. Nevertheless this looks like a bug - the Hebrew strongs in other cases of ir is given as 5892
It gives the same number for me also, Keith, but clicking on that number takes us to the wrong meaning. Thanks for your input.
Thanks for your reply. I thought this to be a bug but wanted to confirm with you folks. Is it that these little critters don't get fixed very quickly? I had reported previously, Leviticus 21:18, with the Inline Interlinear turned on, clicking on the last word "any thing superfluous" and that is also off kilter in that it will not give how it's translated in other Bible versions under the Information panel. It will work with the Interlinear turned off, but it's not been fixed in order to work with the Interlinear turned on. Is what seems to be slow fixes because it's not getting reported to the Techs or is it because there is so many of these problems to be fixed and it doesn't happen in just a few short months?
I checked several translations and get the same error. I noticed that 5895 is given for 'donkeys' and 'cities' in that verse.
The Factbook also opens to Donkey for both 'donkeys' and 'cities' in that verse. With the interlinear turned off in ESV, NASB, and LEB, I get the same error.
The Hebrew word is the word for "donkey" in both cases. There is no error that they are marked the same. Now, the question you seem to be really interested in, is whether the word for "donkey" was intended/was the original text. That is a question of textual criticism, and you can make a case that the second one was originally "city." But don't confuse this with there being an error in the tagging.
Thank you so much, Robert, for that explanation. Would you think that "Havoth-jair" would indeed refer to cities / towns instead of a group of donkeys, and/or a word play is intended as some suggest?
It seems difficult to make sense of a group of donkeys being called "the tent villages of Jair," yes. I don't really see how this could be wordplay. Also, the combination of a form of קָרָא with עַד הַיּוֹם הַזֶּה seems to be the way of sharing the name of geographical features.
Turning on the Insights panel will show that it is a play on words, likely not an error. The parallel 30 donkeys/30 towns was the tell that made me look for this.
c. ‘(thirty) towns’ versions; Hebr. repeats ‘young donkeys’; play on words: ‘air, ‘young donkey’, ‘ir, ‘town’ and jair.
Flaunting the AI rule (sorry, but I am not a Hebrew scholar and am too lazy to track down a commentary to quote to say the same thing.)
There is indeed a Hebrew wordplay in Judges 10:4 involving the words for "donkeys" and "towns/cities." The text says Jair had thirty sons who rode on thirty "donkeys" (ayārîm) and controlled thirty "towns" (‘arîm), called Havvoth-jair.The wordplay is as follows:The Hebrew for "ass colts" (donkeys) is עֲיָרִים (ayārîm).The Hebrew for "towns/cities" is עָרִים (‘arîm).These words are nearly identical in sound, differing only by the presence of a yod (י) in ayārîm (donkeys). The text deliberately uses these similar-sounding words to create a paronomasia, or play on words, between the sons riding donkeys (ayārîm) and their control over towns (‘arîm). This literary device is a hallmark of early Hebrew narrative style and is seen elsewhere in Judges (e.g., Samson’s riddle in Judges 15:16)2."There is a curious play of words on Jair (yair), 'ass-colts' (ayārîm), and 'cities,' which ought to be arîm, but is purposely altered for the sake of the paronomasia. ... The word in Hebrew for ass colts is identical with that for cities, as here pointed, and this play upon the words belongs to the same turn of mind as produced Jotham’s fable and Samson's riddle (Judges 14:14). Judges 10:4 is another form for ערים, from a singular עיר equals עיר, a city, and is chosen because of its similarity in sound to עירים, asses."2Summary: The wordplay in Judges 10:4 is between ayārîm (donkeys) and ‘arîm (towns/cities), emphasizing Jair's wealth and the status of his sons, and showcasing a typical Hebrew literary pun2.
There is indeed a Hebrew wordplay in Judges 10:4 involving the words for "donkeys" and "towns/cities." The text says Jair had thirty sons who rode on thirty "donkeys" (ayārîm) and controlled thirty "towns" (‘arîm), called Havvoth-jair.
The wordplay is as follows:
The Hebrew for "ass colts" (donkeys) is עֲיָרִים (ayārîm).
The Hebrew for "towns/cities" is עָרִים (‘arîm).
These words are nearly identical in sound, differing only by the presence of a yod (י) in ayārîm (donkeys). The text deliberately uses these similar-sounding words to create a paronomasia, or play on words, between the sons riding donkeys (ayārîm) and their control over towns (‘arîm). This literary device is a hallmark of early Hebrew narrative style and is seen elsewhere in Judges (e.g., Samson’s riddle in Judges 15:16)2.
"There is a curious play of words on Jair (yair), 'ass-colts' (ayārîm), and 'cities,' which ought to be arîm, but is purposely altered for the sake of the paronomasia. ... The word in Hebrew for ass colts is identical with that for cities, as here pointed, and this play upon the words belongs to the same turn of mind as produced Jotham’s fable and Samson's riddle (Judges 14:14). Judges 10:4 is another form for ערים, from a singular עיר equals עיר, a city, and is chosen because of its similarity in sound to עירים, asses."2
Summary: The wordplay in Judges 10:4 is between ayārîm (donkeys) and ‘arîm (towns/cities), emphasizing Jair's wealth and the status of his sons, and showcasing a typical Hebrew literary pun2.
Thank you for your helpful thoughts MJ.Smith and Robert Read. Your input is very much valued.
Available Now
Build your biblical library with a new trusted commentary or resource every month. Yours to keep forever.
How do I add a Study Assistant conversation to Favorites? I see that I can add the Study Assistant tool to Favorites, but I haven't figured out how to add a specific conversation to Favorites. When I drag it to Favorites it just adds the tool. I tried to see if I could copy/paste the link in but there's no paste function.…
I want to do a search for ὁ πονηρός in the Septuagint, but in all cases. What would the syntax be, and is there anything else I should know?
I have Logos on my old laptop and now want to move it to my new laptop. Any suggestions?
This ad doesn't make sense to me. It looks like the UBS6 will be offered with or without the apparatus at the bottom the page, even though that is a built-in part of the book. And to add the bottom of each page will more than double the price. Am I reading this right, or is the 'with critical apparatus' referring to…
Does it violate copyright to paste Bible verses from Logos NABRE to social media pages as long as the chapter, verse and source is identified in the paste? If the copyright does not allow under what auspices can it be done, if at all?
