I just read a statement from Logos about Ai and they called it a trend. Really? Its not a trend its the future.
Or a bubble :-)
I saw an article last week that 60% of the time, AI chat bot responses contain hallucinated information or sources. Everything they give you needs to be fact checked.
If AI really is the future, that'd mean we'd be fed a lot of lies, and possibly even lose the ability to fact check.
On the positive side, the Logos AI provides sources from your library or from their catalogue. It's not as bad as most chat bots.
Not all AI have the same IQ. Grok will tell you what resources and why she used it when asked.
I'm not so sure about Grok either.
Why does the AI-powered chatbot Grok post false, offensive things on X? | PBS News
@Jan Krohn Logos AI provides sources from your library or from their catalogue.
yes, but it picks them in some mysterious random process that leaves out the most credible and reliable resources, and severely limits them in number.
Not sure the results are any better than a chat bot.
What Logos is selling now is not the best AI, they are selling a promise it will get better. But how can an AI be trained on the best resources in Logos unless permission is granted by the publishers?
Maybe AI can be used to fact check other AI 😂
I know what you mean… If you search your own library, at least you can search in a collection with "reliable" works.
PBS is bais I would take stock in what they have to say about Grok.
Wouldn't t
Yes - and this is why Logos gives you the ability to narrow the sources to specific tags, collections, etc. The results improve immeasurably and allow you to ask about specific resources - which is an incredible tool (becomes somewhat similar to Google NotebookLM)
