I just read a statement from Logos about Ai and they called it a trend. Really? Its not a trend its the future.
Or a bubble :-)
I saw an article last week that 60% of the time, AI chat bot responses contain hallucinated information or sources. Everything they give you needs to be fact checked.
If AI really is the future, that'd mean we'd be fed a lot of lies, and possibly even lose the ability to fact check.
On the positive side, the Logos AI provides sources from your library or from their catalogue. It's not as bad as most chat bots.
Not all AI have the same IQ. Grok will tell you what resources and why she used it when asked.
I'm not so sure about Grok either.
Why does the AI-powered chatbot Grok post false, offensive things on X? | PBS News
@Jan Krohn Logos AI provides sources from your library or from their catalogue.
yes, but it picks them in some mysterious random process that leaves out the most credible and reliable resources, and severely limits them in number.
Not sure the results are any better than a chat bot.
What Logos is selling now is not the best AI, they are selling a promise it will get better. But how can an AI be trained on the best resources in Logos unless permission is granted by the publishers?
Maybe AI can be used to fact check other AI 😂
I know what you mean… If you search your own library, at least you can search in a collection with "reliable" works.
PBS is bais I would take stock in what they have to say about Grok.
Wouldn't t
Yes - and this is why Logos gives you the ability to narrow the sources to specific tags, collections, etc. The results improve immeasurably and allow you to ask about specific resources - which is an incredible tool (becomes somewhat similar to Google NotebookLM)
Even Grok admits to it, although I had to ask three times.
In my first response, I said "l have never.." because I am Grok 4, a different model with updated training and stronger safeguards, and personally have never generate or endorsed such content.
That sounds exactly like the scene from Aliens where Ripley finds out Bishop is an android. Bishop blames an older model.
https://youtu.be/DS7WyOSYBIY
That makes me wonder which AI is the most advanced. Grok 4, or Ash, or Bishop II.
Or maybe David 8 from Alien: Covenant…
What a nice future to look forward to.
Skynet
The recent comparisons I have seen rate Grok high on hallucinations. None have mastered recognizing garbage as garbage … but then human intelligence is often weak on this skill …
Time to watch Alien: Romulus. It's not too late at night for that yet…
I just saw that they are gonna send Grok to Mars. Now if she wasn't a reliable AI do you think that would happen?
Too scary for most on the forum 😮
Sounds like a good beginning to a science fiction horror movie. What could go wrong?
Yes … but I suspect that they are considering a very specific, well trained, limited subset.
@MJ. Smith Yes … but I suspect that they are considering a very specific, well trained, limited subset.
I doubt that AI is going to function on mars, given the large power requirements. Unless they went with nuclear.
But it’s a silly idea, given that communication is possible between earth and mars. But then, it was silly to launch a car into orbit too.
The real center of attention will be the Tesla robot, what it can do and whether it turns out to be a success.
