Would a bit more refinement solve the problem of conflation two unrelated books of the Bible - this also happens in other AI based tools.
I had to look these up! But it was interesting. It's not just FactBook that's confused. The Lexham Bible Dictionary's listing for "Odes, Book of," says, in part (emphasis added),
ODES, BOOK OF A collection of hymns or canticles primarily derived from the Old and New Testaments that remains part of the liturgical tradition of the Orthodox Church. To be distinguished from the Odes of Solomon, a nonbiblical collection of Christian hymns from the first century.
But farther down in the discussion, under "Content," it says:
Content The book of Odes aptly begins with the chorus, “Sing to the Lord! For he is eminently glorified” (Odes 1:1; compare Exod 15:1).
but the link for "Odes 1:1" (i.e., from the "Book of Odes" not the Odes of Solomon) links to the Odes of Solomon in "The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, Volume 2: Expansions of the “Old Testament” and Legends, Wisdom, and Philosophical Literature, Prayers, Psalms and Odes, Fragments of Lost Judeo-Hellenistic Works."
It looks like there may be many places in multiple Logos resources where these two books are conflated.
For the curious:
https://bibleask.org/what-is-the-book-of-odes/
(to include the Prayer of Manasseh)
Available Now
Build your biblical library with a new trusted commentary or resource every month. Yours to keep forever.
