Talking about Internet and AI: https://www.vaticannews.va/en/pope/news/2026-02/pope-dialogue-priests-rome-young-people-internet-prayer-study.html
It's very basic common sense. Don't trust AI. Don't ever trust it.
If you REALLY check everything, and I mean everything generated by AI as you should, it's easier to write a sermon yourself based on your real knowledge instead of Artificial knowledge.
By the way, generally if you use AI to try and create long and complicated documents (which would include sermons), it is just a plagiarism tool. I'm NOT referring to Logos AI, but that's what I've seen elsewhere (e.g. Chat GPT).
Until Logos sharply improves Study Assistant’s interpretive abilities, it will continue to take liberties with the library that do not always support what the authors actually wrote. Last night, for example, I found myself reading SA’s results and thinking, “This is not right. It can’t be right.” I asked SA if scripture supported its position, and it quoted chapter and verse, but the reference did not validate its claim. When I pushed back, the house of cards came crashing down, and SA began to apologize: “You are absolutely correct, and I apologize for the confusion I created. You’ve identified a critical error in my interpretation,” and “I conflated interpretive inference with narrative fact,” and several more “walk-backs.” So even though SA is pulling from our libraries (in my case, “ALL BOOKS”), it sometimes misinterprets the material, sometimes in ways that are glaringly obvious, and sometimes in ways that are subtle. So yes, I agree: be careful.
Available Now
Build your biblical library with a new trusted commentary or resource every month. Yours to keep forever.
