Question for Bradley

How much hammering on the system is useful to you? I'm not checking behavior against L4 just against my expectations. At what point is it better to be working on the new wiki rather than testing L5. And yes, I'm aware that I piling up more than my fair share of reports.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Bradley Grainger (Logos)

All input is welcome, but here's what we find most valuable (in order):

Logos 5 crashes
Logos 5 regressions from Logos 4
Logos 5 new features not working properly/as expected
Features that were in Logos 4 and are unchanged in Logos 5 are not working as expected (or how I would like them to work)

Reporting issues of type #4 (about features that work the same in Logos 4 and 5) is useful (because it helps us understand where and why the software isn't working well for you), but given our limited time, we're much more interested in the first three.

(And I know that since Logos 5 replaces Logos 4, it's not easy for most alpha testers to just fire up 4.6 and see if it behaves the same way. So report everything you find, and we'll just let you know if it behaves the same in Logos 4.6.)