It seems very odd that lazy and ONLY lazy would appear in the Virtue/Vice Lists result in the Topic Guide. I hoping this wasn't customized for me
Does seem strange. I guess whoever was doing the tagging just didn't feel like doing anymore after dealing with "lazy".
I am not sure exactly what criteria are required for being listed there, but I would expect at least some of the other 7 (or whatever number you ascribe to) vices that exist would have entries. I'll look into it and report back.
It seems very odd that lazy and ONLY lazy would appear in the Virtue/Vice Lists result in the Topic Guide. I hoping this wasn't customized for me ...
...
There are quite a few ways in which the relationships between topics aren't fully populated. The vast majority of the topics come from existing dictionaries: so we only have this topic because Anchor and Dictionary of NT Background do, and probably Laziness doesn't belong here (it's an instance of a vice, but not really relevant to lists of vices and virtues).
if the coverage of a broad topic isn't what you expect, you should probably try with more specific instances (which are typically more informative anyway). I checked as many of the 7 Deadlies as i could recall, and they all have individual topic entries.
Thanks Sean. I suspected that it was a 'typo" in tagging but I have no easy way to verify and report that.
