Favorite book in the revelation collection

What is your favorite work in this collecton. Why?Which one would you consider to be the most helpful? T he intent of this thread is not to incite a theological debate but instead it is intended to help those who just recieved this new colkection. Thanks in advance.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

DAL

The Apocalypse of St. John: The Greek Text with Introduction, Commentary and Notes, by F. J. A. Hort Because it's a classic and it holds to the early date (Pre-70 AD).

By the way, I don't have it in Logos yet because I'm waiting for the collection to be broken up. I have read the print version, though. Great stuff!

DAL

Dean J

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/480447#Comment_480447

Hort is a big reason I got the set, and for the same reasons (his defense of the early date, which was a big factor in convincing me that Irenaeus did not support the Domitianic dating); and Elliott, and Ewald, and Hengstenberg. I think the set was worth the price just for Elliott.

Richard Wilson

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/480456#Comment_480456

However the Ewald book ("Revelation: Its Nature and Record") is a strange inclusion in the collection, it is not about the book of Revelation at all but about the doctrine of revelation. Whoever wrote the description of the book on the product page had not looked very much at the book!

Dean J

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/480484#Comment_480484

However the Ewald book ("Revelation: Its Nature and Record") is a strange inclusion in the collection, it is not about the book of Revelation at all but about the doctrine of revelation. Whoever wrote the description of the book on the product page had not looked very much at the book!

That's disappointing. I was excited to see that he had written a commentary on Revelation--guess not. And yes, I see your point--completely unrelated. How did that one get through? Makes you wonder.