Give Us Credit to Tag Vyrso Books As We Read

As i read Vyrso books it drives me nuts when I come across the missing tags, or worse yet, the autotags that refer to the wrong place. Logos, please consider creating a tool so that we can tag the books as we read and then the other users can benefit. For Vyrso books the reimbursement strategy might be something like

Free book with guarantee to finish tagging it in a reasonable time (one free book to tag at a time)
AND/OR
Credit for corrected tags (like $0.10 Logos credit for Biblical reference tag or correction, $0.25 for non-Biblical tag).

This will definitely be better than the current system and should probably include some sort of system of trustworthiness of the taggers.

And while considering this please consider my crowdsourcing suggestion: http://community.logos.com/forums/p/67543/472116.aspx

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Andy

[Y][Y][Y]

NB.Mick

Logos, please consider creating a tool so that we can tag the books as we read and then the other users can benefit.

Until crowdsources links (and typo corrections) come along, the Community Notes are a tool that can be used to this purpose: join https://faithlife.com/typos and you'll see how it works on some notoriously mis-tagged books like http://vyrso.com/products/search?q=message+of+the+testament+promises or http://vyrso.com/product/14585/the-finished-work-of-christ-the-truth-of-romans-1-8

Lee

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/483324#Comment_483324

[Y] [Y] [Y]

Question asked in another post of mine: would Logos introduce some kind of credit as "bounty" for people who submit x number of significant typos/corrections? This could incentivize typo-hunting etc.

I find that "bounties" are a good way to get open-source projects over certain humps. I'm quite confident Pastor Hantla's scheme would work too.

Actually, such a scheme doesn't need to be limited to Vyrso.

JT (alabama24)

W00T! I'd be a bounty hunter. [:)]

William Gabriel

Based on the personalities I see in this forum, I would suspect that many, many Logos users would do this for no money.

If they had a system where you could correct or create tags for you that stuck around regardless of what Logos did, but then rolled them out to everyone once there was some kind of system-wide consensus*.

I feel like something along these lines would be way more powerful than community highlights. Anyone have a User Voice entry to vote on?

Bill

*There are a lot of ways you could do this. I would vote for a confidence-based ranking system that gives heavy weight to users who have proven to be right in the past. Sounds like you were thinking along the same lines with the "trustworthiness" of taggers.