Suggestion: Digging for the Truth: Collected Essays Regarding the Byzantine Text of the Greek New Te

Paroikos Bible Blog announces the publication of a collection of essays

Digging for the Truth: Collected Essays Regarding the Byzantine Text of the Greek New Testament—A Festschrfit in Honor of Maurice A. Robinson (Fall 2014)

http://www.amazon.com/Digging-Truth-Collected-regarding-Festschrift/dp/3942729814/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1402524979&sr=1-1&keywords=FocusYourMission

Timothy Friberg, “A Modest Explanation for the Layman of Ideas Related to Determining the Text of the Greek New Testament.”
Andrew Wilson, “Scribal Habits and the New Testament.”
John R. Himes, “A Translator Takes a Linguistic Look at Mark’s Gospel.”
T. David Anderson, “Early Textual Recension in Alexandria: An Evaluation of Fee’s Arguments.”
Edward D. Gravely, “The Relationship of the Vaticanus Umlauts to Family 1”
Timothy J. Finney, “Varieties of New Testament Text”
Abidan Paul Shah “The Alexandrian Presumption of Authenticity Regarding the Matthew 27:49 Addition.”
Thomas R. Edgar, “Orthodox Corruption of Scripture: A New Concept”
James A. Borland “The Textual Criticism of Luke 24:53 and Its Implications.”
Andrew Wilson “The Adulteress and Her Accusers: An Examination of the Internal Arguments Relating to the Pericope Adulterae.”
Paul A. Himes, “‘Burned Up’ or ‘Discovered’? The Peculiar Textual Problem of 2 Peter 3:10d.”
T. David Anderson, “Arguments for and against the Byzantine and Alexandrian Text Types.”
Mike Arcieri, “Byzantine Bibliography”

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Lee

[Y] Hope it comes out, at a price that doesn't dent the card. I'm expecting to see more of the Byzantine Text in the future.

David Paul

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/601210#Comment_601210

I'm in just to get the article on the woman caught in adultery. Be interesting to see his POV. From a prophetic perspective it is 100% legit, however it got there. It practically HAS to be in the gospels somewhere.

George Somsel

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/601212#Comment_601212

I'm in just to get the article on the woman caught in adultery. Be interesting to see his POV. From a prophetic perspective it is 100% legit, however it got there. It practically HAS to be in the gospels somewhere.

It wasn't in the earliest manuscripts, but I suspect that it was taken from the no longer extant Gospel of the Hebrews.

Lee

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/601216#Comment_601216

I'm in just to get the article on the woman caught in adultery. Be interesting to see his POV. From a prophetic perspective it is 100% legit, however it got there. It practically HAS to be in the gospels somewhere.

It wasn't in the earliest manuscripts, but I suspect that it was taken from the no longer extant Gospel of the Hebrews.

Some new theories or findings may emerge in a few years regarding this.

George Somsel

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/601218#Comment_601218

I'm in just to get the article on the woman caught in adultery. Be interesting to see his POV. From a prophetic perspective it is 100% legit, however it got there. It practically HAS to be in the gospels somewhere.

It wasn't in the earliest manuscripts, but I suspect that it was taken from the no longer extant Gospel of the Hebrews.

Some new theories or findings may emerge in a few years regarding this.

That may be—one can never predict. One thing is certain, however, the fact that various manuscripts locate the passage in various contexts indicates the pericope was in search of a context and did not originally belong in its current location. That is why I tend to think that it was inserted from a lost gospel. It's almost too good a story and too agreeable with the nature of Jesus as presented in the gospels to consign it to oblivion.

Lee

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/601220#Comment_601220

There'll be more stuff coming out regarding Byz texts, for sure.

Rob

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/601236#Comment_601236

bump