https://wiki.logos.com/Bible_Datatypes has 2 values for Raamattu (1933, 1938) and I don't find values for Biblia de Jerusalen Latinoamericana or the Antioch Bible ...
If it is out of date, I naturally have questions about https://wiki.logos.com/Bible_Verse_Maps as well.
Neither is up to date, though the list of Bibles was never intended to be comprehensive. It's possible the two Bibles you mention use an existing datatype.
I'll see if I can get them updated, but it won't be immediately.
https://wiki.logos.com/Bible_Datatypes is now up to date. All the Bible datatypes are listed, but I haven't been able to identify them all yet. Feel free to fill in any gaps. Some are guessable, but I wanted to verify even the guessable ones with a real resource from my library.
https://wiki.logos.com/Author_Datatypes is also now up to date (but still not much use).
https://wiki.logos.com/List_of_Datatypes isn't done yet. I now have an up-to-date list of these datatypes, but it will take a little while to work out what's new and identify them.
https://wiki.logos.com/Bible_Verse_Maps will take some time. The Antioch Bible, by the way, uses the bible datatype.
Thank you. I filled in a few where I had the resource. And I'm uncertain but suspect this may be accurate.
Question: is it possible for commentaries to have verse maps for which there is no Bible in Logos?
In theory, yes. I'm not sure about practice.
I might possibly have a technique for completing the table automatically. I'm not sure yet.
But a question: what column order and row order works best on the datatype table?
For example, with the row below:
| Internal Name | Aliases | Friendly name || trig | BookOfConcord, ConcordiaTriglotta | Book of Concord |
The friendly name is 'Book of Concord'. If you generate a search from the context menu you'll see 'BookOfConcord'. 'ConcordiaTriglotta' also works. But technically, the datatype is actually called 'trig'.
So, which order should I use for sort, and column order?
And I'm uncertain but suspect this may be accurate.
It's not accurate, I'm afraid (that was my guess too). If you right-click on a reference in that resource, and choose search, then the datatype will be shown in the search window. You'll see that it's plain old <BibleESV>.
I'd go:
| Friendly name | Internal Name | Aliases | with the sort on Friendly name as that is what the user is best able to "guess".
Available Now
Build your biblical library with a new trusted commentary or resource every month. Yours to keep forever.
