[ACK] BUG: duplicate notes indicator

Page 1 of 1 (14 items)
This post has 13 Replies | 1 Follower

Posts 296
Jonathan West | Forum Activity | Posted: Mon, Feb 16 2015 6:50 AM

I notice that a note indicator now appears twice on the NIV where in Logos5 it only appeared once. This applies where a parallel passage indication is below a section heading. (Yes, it is the same note being shown twice!)

 

www.emmanuelecc.org

Posts 27436
Forum MVP
JT (alabama24) | Forum Activity | Replied: Mon, Feb 16 2015 7:58 AM

I am unsure what you think the bug is. Are you saying that it is a bug to show the note indicator where parallel passages are shown (I think I agree)? There isn't a "duplicate" note indicator because you are getting only one note indicator for each reference shown. 

OSX & iOS | Logs |  Install

Posts 296
Jonathan West | Forum Activity | Replied: Mon, Feb 16 2015 8:10 AM

Yes - the bug is it shows the note indicator on the parallel passage reference,

www.emmanuelecc.org

Posts 27436
Forum MVP
JT (alabama24) | Forum Activity | Replied: Mon, Feb 16 2015 8:18 AM

Jonathan West:

Yes - the bug is it shows the note indicator on the parallel passage reference,

Presumably, you have a note indicator at 1 Chronicles 19:1–19. Do you?

OSX & iOS | Logs |  Install

Posts 296
Jonathan West | Forum Activity | Replied: Mon, Feb 16 2015 8:27 AM

Yes I do.

www.emmanuelecc.org

Posts 21702
Forum MVP
Graham Criddle | Forum Activity | Replied: Mon, Feb 16 2015 8:28 AM

Jonathan West:

Yes - the bug is it shows the note indicator on the parallel passage reference,

I can reproduce this - but couldn't tell if the same thing happened in Logos 5

alabama24:
Presumably, you have a note indicator at 1 Chronicles 19:1–19. Do you?

This isn't required - just creating the note against any verse range in the pericope 2 Sam10:1-19 will do it.

EDIT: Sorry Alabama - just seen Jonathan's reply to your question and realise I misunderstood it

Posts 296
Jonathan West | Forum Activity | Replied: Fri, Mar 20 2015 3:50 AM

This didn't happen in Logos 5. It is a bug I think. It's really quite annoying to have note markers on cross references. Can the development team comment please?! Maybe there is a good reason for this?

www.emmanuelecc.org

Posts 26108
Forum MVP
MJ. Smith | Forum Activity | Replied: Fri, Mar 20 2015 2:39 PM

I suspect that this is an error in tagging. I can replicate the problem at the reference shown, but it I try to repeat it on chapter 12, the problem does not appear.

Orthodox Bishop Hilarion Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."

Posts 296
Jonathan West | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Mar 24 2015 11:25 AM

What do you mean by "an error in tagging", computer or human error?!!! Essentially it comes down to the notes being tagged in cross-references in all types of resource. This didn't happen previously.

www.emmanuelecc.org

Posts 26108
Forum MVP
MJ. Smith | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Mar 24 2015 1:11 PM

I mean an error in the resource itself -- most like duplicate begin points for the reference.

Orthodox Bishop Hilarion Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."

Posts 26108
Forum MVP
MJ. Smith | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, May 5 2015 12:07 AM

bump it

Orthodox Bishop Hilarion Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."

Posts 791
LogosEmployee
Eli Evans (Faithlife) | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, May 5 2015 9:28 AM

Hi, all. Can someone who has reproduced this behavior post the steps for reproducing it? Thanks!

Posts 3148
LogosEmployee
Thomas Ball | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, May 5 2015 9:34 AM

Eli Evans:

Hi, all. Can someone who has reproduced this behavior post the steps for reproducing it? Thanks!

I can replicate this. I'll post a report about it.

 

Posts 296
Jonathan West | Forum Activity | Replied: Wed, Sep 23 2015 2:51 AM

Further indications of over-notifying notes(!) - e.g. in the Psalms, the Book 1 is headed by a referebnce (Psalms 1-41) and then all the notes indicators for Psalms 1-41 appear there! This is superfluous, unnecessary, untidy, wrong!!! (See attachment)

I suepect this is symptomatic of the wider problem.

www.emmanuelecc.org

Page 1 of 1 (14 items) | RSS