Holman Concise Bible Commentary: Monograph?

Page 1 of 1 (5 items)
This post has 4 Replies | 1 Follower

Posts 35
nikk | Forum Activity | Posted: Wed, Mar 3 2010 6:32 PM

Is Holman Concise Bible Commentary a commentary or monograph, because in Logos it shows up as a monograph?

Posts 9552
Forum MVP
Mark Smith | Forum Activity | Replied: Wed, Mar 3 2010 6:40 PM

That's wrong metadata. If you want, post the suggested change to type:commentary on the wiki: http://wiki.logos.com/Metadata_correction_proposals

Pastor, North Park Baptist Church

Bridgeport, CT USA

Posts 27974
Forum MVP
Dave Hooton | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, Mar 4 2010 6:25 AM

Mark A. Smith:

That's wrong metadata. If you want, post the suggested change to type:commentary on the wiki: http://wiki.logos.com/Metadata_correction_proposals

It was the subject of a metadata proposal and Monograph was the result. The original wiki entry was:

Holman Concise Bible Commentary should be type:bible-notes, abbrev:HCBC.

Frankly, it's not a Commentary but neither is it a Monograph. I'm going to send an email to logos4feedback@logos.com.

Dave
===

Windows 11 & Android 8

Posts 5637
Todd Phillips | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, Mar 4 2010 7:00 AM

Dave Hooton:

Holman Concise Bible Commentary should be type:bible-notes, abbrev:HCBC.

Frankly, it's not a Commentary but neither is it a Monograph.

How do you differentiate between a single volume commentary and a "bible-notes"?

Wiki Links: Enabling Logging / Detailed Search Help - MacBook Pro (2014), ThinkPad E570

Posts 1228
Ron | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, Mar 4 2010 7:39 AM

According to the "consistency" suggestions on the Wiki, it is being suggested that a commentary comments on every verse whereas a "bible-notes" doesn't.

Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS