Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
This post has 2 Replies | 1 Follower

Posts 4
Daniel Goodwyn | Forum Activity | Posted: Mon, Mar 13 2017 4:52 PM

I've found that links to Apocryphal References are created by RefTagger, but the preview doesn't actually display. Are Apocryphal References meant to be supported? If so, why aren't the previews working? If not, why are the links created?

Example:

http://jewsforjesus.org/publications/issues/issues-v10-n08/a-look-at-the-trinity-from-a-messianic-jewish-perspective/

https://biblia.com/bible/nrsv/1%20Macc.10.19

1 Macc.10:19

Posts 1246
David Mitchell | Forum Activity | Replied: Mon, Mar 13 2017 5:00 PM

RefTagger supports linking to Apocrypha references, but not all Bibles (including ESV, which is selected for your site) contain the Apocrypha.

To enable these references, you can either change the Bible version across your site (in the RefTagger settings) or including a version abbreviation after your reference. For example: 1 Macc. 10:19 (NRSV)

David Mitchell
Development Lead
Faithlife

Posts 4
Daniel Goodwyn | Forum Activity | Replied: Wed, Mar 15 2017 10:51 AM

Thanks. I added NRSV next to them and they work now.

However, it would be nice if the reftagger would allow use of an alternative by default if the selected version doesn't have a reference - or else just not be turned into a link.

Also, somewhat related, I found that on https://jewsforjesus.org/answers/did-jesus-teach-his-disciples-to-hate-their-parents/ when the reftagger sees 2 Baruch 70:3, it links Baruch 70:3. If 2 Baruch isn't supported, can it detect that it was meant to be that, and not show a link?

This makes me wonder which books are supported. Is there a list I can see? For example, it doesn't seem to detect also Jubilees 23:19.

There's also an uncommon syntax used in this commentary where it uses roman numerals for chapters.. like this: Baruch lxx.3 ff.; IV Ezra v.9; vi.24; Enoch ii

Baruch 70:3

Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | RSS