I personally see this as a bug, but I've no doubt the developers see this as functioning as designed. However, I see the whole idea of linking highlights/notes to be poor design, thus broken, thus a bug.
The poor design, in my opinion, is the connection between notes and highlights. Most people don't intuitively see 'Remove annotation' as entailing 'Remove note' also. Linking the two together precludes, as best I can tell, the ability to remove a highlight while at the same time retaining the note. That's unfortunate.
IOW, adding a noted and adding a highlight are two completely separate events and concepts. (consider most of the time they are kept in two separate documents) Linking the two inseparably is bad design. (IM[NS]HO)
)
This leads to many users clicking 'Remove Annotations' having the impression that the highlight will be removed, and are quite surprised that the note is also removed. Then they are horrified when they realize there is no way to recover the note. (that's also bad, I mean unfortunate, btw; hence the subject)
Is there any way to redesign (and perhaps refactor) this process to make it more user friendly and intuitive? And, of course, adding the ability to undelete a note (even if you don't redesign the process by "unlinking" notes and highlights).
Thanks,
James