Philana: Two oddities in The Nelson Study Bible: New King James Version

Note that the resource is simply chosen as an example and that it is annotations only ...

Question 1: Why is the chart not tagged so that it appears in a chart search?

Question 2: Why does the right click menu bring up information regarding the non-existent text of Mk 5:23 for the heading of a chart? It appears that it fails to recognize the boundary between the verse commentary and the broader (generic) table. Many of the items on the right click menu refer to the non-existent text rather than the commentary text which is what actually appears in this resource ... not particularly helpful clutter, IMHO.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Philana R. Crouch

Note that the resource is simply chosen as an example and that it is annotations only ...

Question 1: Why is the chart not tagged so that it appears in a chart search?

Becuase Media search is searching for images that are charts, not text charts.

Question 2: Why does the right click menu bring up information regarding the non-existent text of Mk 5:23 for the heading of a chart? It appears that it fails to recognize the boundary between the verse commentary and the broader (generic) table. Many of the items on the right click menu refer to the non-existent text rather than the commentary text which is what actually appears in this resource ... not particularly helpful clutter, IMHO.

I'll look into why this is tagged this way.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/952632#Comment_952632

Thank you. All these years I've thought "charts" meant "charts" in the more inclusive sense. No wonder I've never found what I wanted. But then what are "tables"?

scooter

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/952665#Comment_952665

Thank you. All these years I've thought "charts" meant "charts" in the more inclusive sense. No wonder I've never found what I wanted. But then what are "tables"?

We were just having this discussion at home the other day. I personally say chart=table for non-science uses. So does my spouse......What I was looking at called a graph a chart. Uh-uh.

Andrew Batishko

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/952665#Comment_952665

Tables tend to be information represented in rows and columns of a table. Charts are information represented in other ways. In my opinion, some of those tables (family trees) should be marked as charts.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/952677#Comment_952677

Thanks Andrew. I'll try to revise my memory correctly :-)

Philana R. Crouch

Question 2: Why does the right click menu bring up information regarding the non-existent text of Mk 5:23 for the heading of a chart? It appears that it fails to recognize the boundary between the verse commentary and the broader (generic) table. Many of the items on the right click menu refer to the non-existent text rather than the commentary text which is what actually appears in this resource ... not particularly helpful clutter, IMHO.

Hi M.J.,

I just wanted to follow up. I talked with the team who creates the resources and they indicated that the table is tagged by the reference because it was in that section.

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/952868#Comment_952868

Thanks, Philana, that confirms what I suspected - another quirk of Logos tagging not necessarily intended by the authors.