Bible Software Consolidation -- Who's Next?

In just over two years, we saw two major Bible software brands sunset:

1) BibleWorks ~ 2018

2) Wordsearch (and its predecessor brands Bible Explorer, QuickVerse, PC Study Bible) ~ 2020

Who do you is the next one to fall? OliveTree? Accordance?

It looks like Faithlife / Logos might be the last one standing...

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

MJ. Smith

Or there is an interesting question of why BibleWorks went into compatibility maintenance only mode rather than selling/merging. I would suspect that Accordance still has a stable financial base.

Rene Atchley

I have a form of Logos since seminary which amounts to something like 25 years. Experiences with this software has led me to detest its advertising, complications of use, high expense, and generally annoying habits of automating the simplest things that I can do myself. As a result of my relationship with Faithlife over the years I have used all possible bible based programs that were alternatives to this beast. So now Wordsearch has been bought and an absolute monopoly for many, if not all, aspects of the bible related software market has been concentrated into this company (in windows)...with the result of discontinuation of the Wordsearch platform. So now I hesitate to spend anymore money on Logos in anticipation of it being sold to the highest bidder and waste of more of my money.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117007#Comment_1117007

Olive Tree is now owned by HarperCollins. Accordance is still independent I think. Let's see how much longer can they stand.

Bruce Dunning

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117025#Comment_1117025

So now I hesitate to spend anymore money on Logos in anticipation of it being sold to the highest bidder and waste of more of my money.

Personally I think Logos is in a solid financial position and the possibility of this happening is slim. Even if it does happen at some point, the shear number of people who have invested in Logos increases the likelihood of Logos continuing.

SineNomine

Who do you is the next one to fall? OliveTree? Accordance?

I expect that Faithlife and Accordance are in the best positions for the future. In that order.

Jon

While I would love for Olive Tree or Accordance to be acquired by Logos, solely to get the resources I have there to finally be available in Logos, at the same time I recognize that less competition is never a good thing for customers [:S]

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117087#Comment_1117087

Totally agreed!

As a matter of fact, when I first saw the announcement yesterday about WS being acquired by Logos, my first thought was: That's the end of affordable prices on resources available on WS!

Mark Smith

I think Kevin Purcell wrote cogently on why some Bible software companies are unable to compete in the current environment when he discussed the shut down of BibleWorks. Worth a read.

Both Logos and Accordance seem to check off the boxes he mentioned as critical, but if there is a declining market for serious Bible study tools (as he believes) then that will erode both companies' bottom lines

It seems Logos is a mature product right now. I am not sure what new features they can continue to come up with over time that will truly enhance Bible study. If so, less money will be spent on development which will be a good thing for the company's bottom line.

SineNomine

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117162#Comment_1117162

It seems Logos is a mature product right now. I am not sure what new features they can continue to come up with over time that will truly enhance Bible study. If so, less money will be spent on development which will be a good thing for the company's bottom line.

Or there will be continued expansion into areas that aren't strictly Bible study: sermon creation, academic theology studies, patristics/classics, religious education, etc.

R. Mansfield

Who do you is the next one to fall? OliveTree? Accordance?

It looks like Faithlife / Logos might be the last one standing...

I can assure you Accordance is doing just fine. We’re not going to “fall,” and we’re not going anywhere.

There’s room for more than one major Bible software company. It’s not a zero sum game. This isn’t Highlander. There can be more than one.

DAL

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117264#Comment_1117264

Hello, Mansfield!

I still have my Accordance Bible Software. I love the graphics and Paper. There’s room for more than one Bible Software. Each has its strengths and weaknesses. I can use both! I’m glad you guys are doing fine and are not going anywhere 👍😁👌

DAL

Bob Pritchett

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117063#Comment_1117063

Olive Tree is now owned by HarperCollins.

HarperCollins Christian Publishing sold Olive Tree it just over a week ago:

https://www.olivetree.com/press/pressrelease09112020.php

Paul Caneparo

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117274#Comment_1117274

Olive Tree is now owned by HarperCollins.

HarperCollins Christian Publishing sold Olive Tree it just over a week ago:

https://www.olivetree.com/press/pressrelease09112020.php

Would have loved my Olive Tree library in Faithlife too.

Bob Pritchett

It looks like Faithlife / Logos might be the last one standing...

When we started there were lots of DOS programs, and soon many Windows ones... QuickVerse, Ask God, BibleWindows, GRAMCORD, Wordsearch, CDWordLibrary, Online Bible, PC Study Bible, etc.

Today many of those are gone, but there are even more mobile apps, web sites, etc.

I think of our space as incredibly competitive -- while QuickVerse and BibleWorks and PC Study Bible have faded as competitors, YouVersion, BibleHub, and others have come on strong, and new mobile apps and web sites seem to spring up every month.

People haven't stopped studying the Bible, and they haven't stopped building new tools to help! :-)

David Thomas

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117274#Comment_1117274

Olive Tree is now owned by HarperCollins.

HarperCollins Christian Publishing sold Olive Tree it just over a week ago:

https://www.olivetree.com/press/pressrelease09112020.php

This is an interesting read! Having watched Parson's Technology; QuickVerse; WORDSearch life-cycle, seeing OT sell to HarperCollins then spin-off to a private holder gives me cause to wonder.

David Wanat

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117276#Comment_1117276

It looks like Faithlife / Logos might be the last one standing...

When we started there were lots of DOS programs, and soon many Windows ones... QuickVerse, Ask God, BibleWindows, GRAMCORD, Wordsearch, CDWordLibrary, Online Bible, PC Study Bible, etc.

Today many of those are gone, but there are even more mobile apps, web sites, etc.

I think of our space as incredibly competitive -- while QuickVerse and BibleWorks and PC Study Bible have faded as competitors, YouVersion, BibleHub, and others have come on strong, and new mobile apps and web sites seem to spring up every month.

People haven't stopped studying the Bible, and they haven't stopped building new tools to help! :-)

Ah yes. I remember in 2007 looking through all the Bible software in an overstock store. I decided to pick up Libronix because it was the only one with the NAB as an option. The rest was history.

David Thomas

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117276#Comment_1117276

When we started there were lots of DOS programs, and soon many Windows ones... QuickVerse, Ask God, BibleWindows, GRAMCORD, Wordsearch, CDWordLibrary, Online Bible, PC Study Bible, etc.

Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda - If only Pradis could have been acquired like WORDSearch (with Pradis resources FREE migration to Logos); I would be able to dump that older program. I just can't bring myself to REpurchase the Expositor's Bible Commentary (even at the occasional $130) discounted price.

[I realize that while the migration is free for users, it cost dearly for Logos to acquire these users and their libraries from Lifeway.] Bob, thank you for investing in your user base.

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117274#Comment_1117274

HarperCollins Christian Publishing sold Olive Tree it just over a week ago:

https://www.olivetree.com/press/pressrelease09112020.php

Wow, that's interesting news about Olive Tree, and an interesting life story of the new owner.

danwdoo

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117302#Comment_1117302

I too would have loved to see Olive Tree join with Logos if nothing else because they offered a range of foreign language bibles I can't get in Logos.

mab

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117564#Comment_1117564

I had several programs running at one point. Accordance, Pradis, eSword, Wordsearch, Logos and Online Bible. When Logos 4 was still in beta on the Mac, I realized that this was nuts. As soon as Logos 4 came out, so did the pruning shears. I acquired BibleWorks which is still cool for searching, but Logos is where you will find me most all of the time. I don't miss any of the others.

Logos runs on everything and is truly the library king. I am so grateful because I could never do what I do without it.[8-|]

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117627#Comment_1117627

Same for me except for Online Bible. I also have Olive Tree for Windows and other Chinese Bible tools on Windows and other apps on iPad.

Fabian

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117162#Comment_1117162

It seems Logos is a mature product right now. I am not sure what new features they can continue to come up with over time that will truly enhance Bible study.

I have made some request. If the developers have a boring time I would love to see my request come alive.

Fabian

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117564#Comment_1117564

I too would have loved to see Olive Tree join with Logos if nothing else because they offered a range of foreign language bibles I can't get in Logos.

I see this problem in nearly all Bible softwares. They could easily get more customers if they would realize "We need Bibles in more foreign languages".

Why should I buy a Bible software if they don't support a Bible in may language? Second: Or if the import of a public domain Bible in my language is nearly unsuccessful, because the import options are not good enough. (This points to my post above.)

MJ. Smith

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117162#Comment_1117162

I am not sure what new features they can continue to come up with over time that will truly enhance Bible study

In documenting the Search, I've discovered several holes they can fill and areas that need improvement or updating that could truly be helps. But you are right that updates for technological changes and contemporary user interfaces will be the major chunk of their time.

Donovan R. Palmer

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117264#Comment_1117264

There’s room for more than one major Bible software company. It’s not a zero sum game. This isn’t Highlander. There can be more than one.

And I would argue that there is a need for more than one. I love, love, love Accordance. At least for the way that my brain is wired, the workflows for focusing on the text is so much better for me. Laser fast and it just seems to make me focus better on scriptures. I plan to invest more into it this winter.

And I think I can say this because I also have a large investment in Logos and have been using it since Series X. I still prefer Logos for research as it is my go to for sifting through tons of materials I have accumulated over the years. Considering the size of my library, the speed isn't too bad.

And I hope they are never merged into one. My hope is that Accordance and Logos can continue to have very prosperous futures, each with their own personality.

Be blessed... we have amazing tools!

(sorry for the three Ands... maybe years from now someone will study our texts and wonder if this was some sort of literary device or my bad writing style [;)] )

DMB

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1119676#Comment_1119676

And I hope they are never merged into one.

And I'm thinking Bible platforms, like other software, encourage (demand) a way of thinking. I was late to the BW party, but I keep it open for quick use. It seems to 'flash' the related OL info faster than you can think you want it. Logos is largely a make-a-list proposition, with little interest in the centuries that separate list items. Accordance is somewhere in the middle.

Tes

In just over two years, we saw two major Bible software brands sunset:

1) BibleWorks ~ 2018

2) Wordsearch (and its predecessor brands Bible Explorer, QuickVerse, PC Study Bible) ~ 2020

Who do you is the next one to fall? OliveTree? Accordance?

It looks like Faithlife / Logos might be the last one standing...

PC Study Bible

Tes

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1119426#Comment_1119426

"We need Bibles in more foreign languages".

Amharic, Geez, Tigrinya etc..

Donovan R. Palmer

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1119680#Comment_1119680

And I'm thinking Bible platforms, like other software, encourage (demand) a way of thinking.

Boom! That's right. Each tool has a different approach. There are times that I want everything to fall away and for the Biblical text come to the front and drive my studies... this is where the Accordance designers get into my headspace.

Yet the true is opposite for Logos on research. I feel more comfortable with it's approach... and the guides and tools are helpful too when I need to get a workup on something very quickly.

Both are great tools, and I am so very glad to have them, though in this season I am tending to use Accordance more and in other seasons it has been the other way around.

I was late to the BW party, but I keep it open for quick use. It seems to 'flash' the related OL info faster than you can think you want it.

I seriously considered buying in BW at one stage, but when I moved to Mac back in 2008, I got into Accordance and never looked back. It is like a sharp tool that just cranks it out...

DAL

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1119691#Comment_1119691

There are times that I want everything to fall away and for the Biblical text come to the front and drive my studies... this is where the Accordance designers get into my headspace.

Would you mind explaining this to me (maybe others can pitch in too). When I use Logos I study the text. I type a text and get results for the text I'm using. I focus mainly on pericopes, outlining the text, defining words, checking background material and different commentaries. Most stuff you do when studying a passage. Getting the exegetical outline then convert it to a homiletical outline, etc.

I go to Accordance and I seem to be doing the same. But...I keep hearing people say Accordance focuses on the text and Logos "doesn't." I'm not sure what you and others mean.

Thanks!

DAL

David Thomas

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1119729#Comment_1119729

Would you mind explaining this to me (maybe others can pitch in too).

I believe the "Bible text to come to the front" is an intentional focus on primary literature which may be parsed by datasets (Exegetical guide?). But if a user builds a large "Library System" with many hyperlinks to secondary or tertiary sources (some sections of Passage Guide?) then it is possible for the primary source to get backgrounded if the student loses focus.

cshover8669

I do not know who is next, but I really hope that I maintain the features I like best about the different software packages out there. If you count Word Search, I own 6 different bible study software tools. Logos is my primary go to, and the others, I go to for what is different. There are ones that do maps and graphics much better than logos, and one that generates a great word cloud on book or verse range, and one that has a resource that is not available in any of the other software libraries; anther one is much better as a mobile app than the others. I spend 95% of my time in Logos, but use the other ones as needed to enhance what I am doing through Logos. That is just what I use on my desktop and laptop. In Church, I use a seventh one to follow along with the sermons and take notes on the fly. Thanks, Carla

David Paul

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1119822#Comment_1119822

Well, count me as one who'd like to see FL acquire Galaxie, because not only would that allow FL to properly maximize the hyperlinking of the resources in Galaxie's stable, but it would move FL into an area I would like to see them expand their reach in...journals. If FL owned the Galaxie market, it would likely provide opportunities for relationships beyond Galaxie in the journal sphere.

DMB

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1119817#Comment_1119817

I believe the "Bible text to come to the front" is an intentional focus on primary literature

I can't speak for Donovan, but for guys, the difference is similar to tools ... some are designed to do just one task; others allow customizing. When you grab the designed-for, you concentrate on the job. When you grab the customizable, you dink around first, and then the job. Guys that show up at our house almost uniformly have the designed-for ... grab and go.

In Bible study, it's similar. I'd argue that most Christians are grab and go. A Bible, some text notes, maps, and maybe some background. Done. The Logos market is hugely customizable (but still limited to early 1900s studying). Accordance started out more grab and go, but is slowly adding this and that. BW is most definitely grab and go. Pedal to the metal and don't look back.

The presumption text vs OL is from the late 1800s and early 1900s. For example, my software is grab and go, but not exegesis. Analytics. You have whichever text you want, in whatever language. The text is highly marked-up, along with over-laying diagrams. On the other side, you have visualizations for aging, style, phrase-matching, theology-structuring, sequenced notes and so forth. Like BW, it answers questions quickly.

Rene Atchley

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1120474#Comment_1120474

There was two things that I took away from a Wesleyan/Methodist view on theology and faith was a) the text is primary and b) theology is opinion on/about the text. From this perspective the approach to text work from Logos seems little more than an attempt to use ai to spit out predigested assumptions, conclusions, and speculations from "expert" about the text. When I used PC study Bible/Quickverse/Wordsearch/esword it seems to me that I was directly interacting with the text with many fewer levels of opinion that got in my way. Why keep this software? All of my professional books are now digital with Logos and everyone else has disappeared from the market....so I'm home until another bigger fish swallows this one.

Donovan R. Palmer

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1119729#Comment_1119729

Would you mind explaining this to me (maybe others can pitch in too).

Sorry for the delayed response. I don’t spend much time on the forums any more. Let me say up front, my views are completely subjective. Everyone’s mileage varies based on the way their minds work, their training, culture, etc.

To me, probably drawing from an orientation from when Logos was based on the ‘Libronix Library System’, the work flows undergirding the software design are very research oriented. When I was in formal studies, Logos was my number one program. I have a huge library and the monographs I collected were essential as I did not live close to a seminary library. The guides and the tools helped me sift through finding nuggets buried in my library that I didn’t even know it were there. Mining my resources, Logos is my seminary library on steroids.

For me, the Accordance workflows are fined tuned towards exegetical studies. I can cover the text quicker and faster using carefully selected resources in a very, very efficient way. It’s not just the speed of the software (though it is blazingly fast even on older hardware), but the design of the menus and keyboard clicks. Most work flows start with a keyboard command or a menu item from the text that take me directly to the info I want to go to. Windows open, expand and contract taking me quickly back to the text. Again, subjective, because this is the way my mind works in focus. The fluff is cut away and I focus on the gold in the text. Accordance is my mega study Bible on steroids.

Both tools can do what the other one does, and perhaps for others the experience is different. That’s ok and that’s why we are blessed to have choices. These days now that my formal studies are over I spend more time in Accordance. I still run Logos alongside to drill for research and even run the web app in a browser within Accordance at times for light research work, though most of the time I run Logos as stand alone. I am blessed to have a huge Logos library that I have built up over the years and don’t buy as much these days. Would love to buy some more journals and church father resources, but without research driving me I can‘t justify it without an amazing deal as it is now in the ‘nice to haves’.

One thing I will say about Logos is that I think the learning curve is a little less and the guides really help someone do study and research very quickly without having to learn so much about the software. With Accordance initially had to sit down with the Dr. J videos and work much harder to learn how to use it in my studies, memorizing clicks and keyboard strokes. The initial investment paid off in speed and better quality exegetical studies because I really get what is going on under the hood. I can rip through text much faster than I can on Logos. With that said, I can rip through my Library in Logos faster and the guides are awesome to put it to me in a very efficient manner.

I plan to upgrade to Logos 9, and I plan to make some more investments in Accordance this winter as well. Both are awesome tools, and while I could live with only one or the other, I am blessed to have both!

Kevin A. Purcell

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117162#Comment_1117162

I think Kevin Purcell wrote cogently on why some Bible software companies are unable to compete in the current environment when he discussed the shut down of BibleWorks. Worth a read.

Thanks

abondservant

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1119426#Comment_1119426

I too would have loved to see Olive Tree join with Logos if nothing else because they offered a range of foreign language bibles I can't get in Logos.

I see this problem in nearly all Bible softwares. They could easily get more customers if they would realize "We need Bibles in more foreign languages".

Why should I buy a Bible software if they don't support a Bible in may language? Second: Or if the import of a public domain Bible in my language is nearly unsuccessful, because the import options are not good enough. (This points to my post above.)

In a sense when it comes to resources Logos is a reactive product.

A book is produced, there is a lot of demand, logos takes the book, and adds in their extra value, and then produces it a half year or more later.

Logos could easily be a proactive product where they read the market, or better read the need for certain resources... Bible translations in 10/40 window countries for instance, and put those out in partnership with the translators making that happen. A partnership with Wycliff or Pioneer would make a lot of sense in that regard.

Other missionaries could then reap the harvest of such work the next time they have an internet connection.

I know someone who wrote a whole bible commentary in the language of an indian tribe in south america as a personal book. They were printing them, putting them in 3 ring binders and distributing them among the natives. While at the same time, the missionaries imported the .doc into logos, and had the commentary to facilitate their own work with the tribe.

A fully functional logos version of these translations make sense. I bet they could make a faithlife group, and distribute the licenses that way, and be ahead of the curve, and be partnered together on the front lines with those doing the work.

Maybe they already are. Who knows!:)

Small Heath

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1122016#Comment_1122016

And there's the retail biggies Rose Publishing / Christianbook

https://www.christianbook.com/?navcat=toplogo

https://www.hendricksonrose.com/page/wl/hr/hr-about

The Flanary's

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1122129#Comment_1122129

And there's the retail biggies Rose Publishing / Christianbook

https://www.christianbook.com/?navcat=toplogo

https://www.hendricksonrose.com/page/wl/hr/hr-about

WOW, I hadn't heard of this one! I didn't see an announcement but the Rose website logged in with my CBD credentials and contained all my info and orders. Color me shocked [:P]

Bobby Terhune

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117564#Comment_1117564

Well it seems Accordance has changed hands. Roy and Helen Brown stepped down.

Accordance majority owner shifted to Troy Wormell, with the founders, Roy and Helen Brown, retaining minority ownership.

Gregory Lawhorn

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1117264#Comment_1117264

I can assure you Accordance is doing just fine. We’re not going to “fall,” and we’re not going anywhere.

There’s room for more than one major Bible software company. It’s not a zero sum game. This isn’t Highlander. There can be more than one.

In many cases there NEEDS to be both. I used Accordance for a number of years, and then added Logos. While I don't use Accordance nearly as much anymore, I can imagine that many scholars would find BOTH programs useful.

DMB

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1136299#Comment_1136299

In many cases there NEEDS to be both.

True. Each seems to go down a path of mirrors, until a new batch of customers appears that aren't impressed with the mirrors.

I really like the introduction of what is being called Word Maps, available in Accordance. The Lexham Biblical DSS interlinear hints at it, but 'word maps' make varients a lot easier to map out, as well as semantic equivalents.

mab

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/1136309#Comment_1136309

I still wish somehow that FL could fund BW and get them to run native on Mac. I never got deep into it, but I like it's lean strip-down search Bible interface. There's something to be said for putting first things first. I run lots of exegetical guides on verses because if aren't looking at text you often miss the main attraction.