Yes, some of these requests are poorly worded in that library type rather than datatype/index control the priority. But both we and Faithlife can respond to what is intended even if inaccurately described from the technical perspective.
Prioritize resources by type | Faithlife Feedback
Add ability to sort Basic Search by Resource Prioritization | Faithlife Feedback
Add prioritization to the web app | Faithlife Feedback
I've voted for all of them. I'm hoping Faithlife notices the second one in particular.
Perhaps you can explain how unprioritized resources will be sorted i.e. resources that don't need to be prioritized?
I've voted for all of them. I'm hoping Faithlife notices the second one in particular. Perhaps you can explain how unprioritized resources will be sorted i.e. resources that don't need to be prioritized?
Exactly as they already are by default.
I responded more completely in the Feedback site.
