Unexpected search result

Hi

As below I was searching for "commit your ways to the lord" and got a strange result.

image

Any idea what is happening here?

Graham

Comments

  • George Somsel
    George Somsel Member Posts: 10,150 ✭✭✭


    Hi

    As below I was searching for "commit your ways to the lord" and got a strange result.

    image

    Any idea what is happening here?

    Graham


    That would be a rather unexpected result.  I note that you didn't put the string in quotes.  I get the proper result.  See attached.

     

    image

    george
    gfsomsel

    יְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן

  • Graham Criddle
    Graham Criddle MVP Posts: 33,290

     

    That would be a rather unexpected result.  I note that you didn't put the string in quotes.  I get the proper result.  See attached

    Thanks George

    Yes, omitting the quotes was an error but when I added quotes to my search string  I got zero results!

    Then I saw you had corrected the string by changing "ways" to "way".

    When I removed the quotes again and ran it with "way" instead of "ways" then I got the Ps 37:5 result which makes sense.

    But I still don't understand why I got my original result - something doesn't seem right!

    Graham

  • George Somsel
    George Somsel Member Posts: 10,150 ✭✭✭


     

    That would be a rather unexpected result.  I note that you didn't put the string in quotes.  I get the proper result.  See attached

    Thanks George

    Yes, omitting the quotes was an error but when I added quotes to my search string  I got zero results!

    Then I saw you had corrected the string by changing "ways" to "way".

    When I removed the quotes again and ran it with "way" instead of "ways" then I got the Ps 37:5 result which makes sense.

    But I still don't understand why I got my original result - something doesn't seem right!

    Graham


    Was that an interlinear that you received hits for?  It may have been reading the English.

    george
    gfsomsel

    יְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן

  • steve clark
    steve clark Member Posts: 3,591 ✭✭✭

    But I still don't understand why I got my original result - something doesn't seem right!

    i get the same results as you when i have Match all word forms turned off. my guess is that L4 is looking for a single verse where each of your words occurs in all Bibles. And this is found only in a single verse in the LXX. If you will notice the colors as shown below:

    image

    when you look closely to each color in the interlinear LXX, you will see all the olive colored ones has to within the gloss under the Greek words. All the tan words has the under the Greek...and so on.

    But it you change to Match all word forms you see more clearly what L4 is trying to do

    image

    EDIT: to sum it up, L4 is applying the AND function to each of your words in the search
    commit AND your AND ways AND to AND the AND lord

     

    EDIT2: Bible Search looks for your search occurrence within a single verse. Basic Search looks within all text (it can cross over verse boundaries). This might also be useful to know.

    QLinks, Bibl2, LLR, Macros
    Dell Insp 17-5748, i5, 1.7 GHz, 8G RAM, win 8.1

  • Dave Hooton
    Dave Hooton MVP Posts: 36,339

    EDIT: to sum it up, L4 is applying the AND function to each of your words in the search
    commit AND your AND ways AND to AND the AND lord

    EDIT2: Bible Search looks for your search occurrence within a single verse. Basic Search looks within all text (it can cross over verse boundaries). This might also be useful to know.

    It is an AND search as per Google, with the words restricted to one verse in a Bible search. Basic Search will enlarge the boundary to one chapter. If you specify "Surface Text" the result will only be found in English bibles.

    Dave
    ===

    Windows 11 & Android 13

  • Graham Criddle
    Graham Criddle MVP Posts: 33,290

    Steve & Dave

    Many thanks for your comments, analysis and insight - most helpful.

    Graham

This discussion has been closed.