I am currently reading "A Complete Guide to Understanding the Dispensational Controversy" as I seek to sharpen my thinking on this subject. My leanings are Covenant but I would not be able to defend that position intelligently. Could someone please point me to a comparable Logos resource from a Covenant standpoint? I see a lot of treatment in my Systematic Theologies and Dogmatics resources but would like a monograph to balance out this reading if possible.
TIA
Unfortunately, the best resource is not in Logos. The Christ of the Covenants by O. Palmer Robertson is generally seen as one of the best discussions of Covenant theology. Michael Horton's God of Promise is also good, but again, not in Logos. I've not yet come across good works on Covenant theology in Logos, and will be interested to hear if anyone knows of any.
Chris Roberts: Unfortunately, the best resource is not in Logos. The Christ of the Covenants by O. Palmer Robertson is generally seen as one of the best discussions of Covenant theology. Michael Horton's God of Promise is also good, but again, not in Logos. I've not yet come across good works on Covenant theology in Logos, and will be interested to hear if anyone knows of any.
I was going to say the same thing. There's also Introducing Covenant Theology by Michael Horton that's also not in Logos
Pink's The Divine Covenants is available in Logos--he writes from a covenantal Baptist point-of-view (differing view of the sacraments from Reformed), but he can be helpful.
So for the Presbyterian/Reformed view, we're limited to what the Reformed systematics say:
It would be good to have Robertson's and Horton's works in Logos.
Wiki Links: Enabling Logging / Detailed Search Help - MacBook Pro (2014), ThinkPad E570
The book "Treaty of the Great King" by Meredith Kline is a good one. It is out of print and not in Logos, however, it can be pieced together.
The Wycliffe Bible Commentary Old Testament- The chapter on Deuteronomy is authored by Kline and contains most of the content of the book.
Also, The Westminster Theological Journal- contains several articles by Kline. Note: you can also get these at a better price by purchasing the Theological Journal Library.
I think the "Treaty" book is a combination of the Deuteronomy commentary and the article "Because it Had Not Rained" in Volume 20 Number 2 of WTJ, but I could be mistaken. It is a combination of the commentary and one of his articles from the journal.
There is also "The Covenant Formula" by Rolf Rendtorff. It's very scholarly but looks at the covenant structure of the old testament in the same manner Kline and Horton do, namely that the structure of God's covenant is the same as the suzerain/vassal treaties of the ANE.
By the way "Introducing Covenant Theology" and "God of Promise" by Michael Horton are the same book with different titles.
Thank you gentlemen. I may have to opt to do this portion of my study outside Logos.
Todd Phillips: Chris Roberts: Unfortunately, the best resource is not in Logos. The Christ of the Covenants by O. Palmer Robertson is generally seen as one of the best discussions of Covenant theology. Michael Horton's God of Promise is also good, but again, not in Logos. I've not yet come across good works on Covenant theology in Logos, and will be interested to hear if anyone knows of any. It would be good to have Robertson's and Horton's works in Logos.
Yes, I second the recommendation of O. Palmer Robertson's Christ of the Covenants. I'm not familiar with Horton's book but would love to see Robertson in Logos. He also wrote a good one called The Israel of God: Yesterday, Today, and Tomorrow on how to view modern day Israel and the Church in light of biblical Israel.
How to Ask for Help | Logos Wiki | My Machine Specs | My Blog
Thanks Rosie. I too hope that Logos will add a couple of these resources. It may be a little bit of a fringe study but I think it is worthwhile.
Walter Kaiser somehow manages to sit between Covenantal and Dispensational Theology. His Promise Plan of God is in Logos. Four views on Moving Beyond the Bible to Theology is also useful.
David, That is exactly what I was looking for, thanks!