In the hope of getting consistent metadata, I submit the following -
The Nag Hammadi Library in English is the only English Language Ancient Manuscript. All other English translations are Monographs.
The Ugaritic texts are not listed as Ancient Manuscripts
Foundation Documents of the Gospel Coalition is not a Journal
What determines the difference between Bible Notes and Bible Commentaries? Related is what is a Study Bible, type wise. Some are typed as each.
All the volumes of Evangelical Review of Theology should be the same type - in my opinion, they are Journals
I would lean toward Journal for Semeia as well.
Biographical Entries from Evangelical Dictionary of Theology, A Dictionary of Biblical Tradition in English Literature, A Dictionary of Women in Church History, and Handbook of Evangelical Theologians are all Dictionaries
Oxford Bible Commentary is a Commentary
Luther's Works Volume 10 is a Commentary
In general, the Monographs should be examined to see if they can be broken up into some more meaningful type descriptions.