Linking Logos, Biblia or Faithlife Window to BECNT

I notice the following issue on Logos 5, biblia.com and faithlife.com

Setting the Scene: I have my ESV opened in window 1 (W1) and the BECNT in window 2 (W2) so that scrolling in W1 will automatically scroll through the contents of W2.

Also we know that BECNT's layout has the "Exegesis and Exposition" and "Additional Notes" section where most of the commentary is in the former section.

But what I experience is, whenever entering particular verses in my bible (W1), the BECNT (W2) links any verse I enter in W1 to the "Additional Notes" section as opposed to the "Exegesis and Exposition".

Is this how BECNT is coded for the Logos 5 and web platform? Any way to change this from the user (my) end? Or can this be a suggestion for Logos to get the Bible verses, or any book for that matter, link to "Exegesis and Exposition" instead of the "Additional Notes"?

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Graham Criddle

Hi Ritchin

From a quick check different volumes of BECNT act in different ways.

Philippians seems to link to "Additional Notes"
John seems to be linked to "Exegesis and Exposition"
Romans isn't structured the same way at all

Which volume(s) are you looking at and can you give a passage where you see this?

Graham

Ritchin Eapen Sen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/514627#Comment_514627

I noticed it couple of times earlier, but don't remember those references. But today I was looking at Acts 13:32 and it took me to "Additional Notes".

Graham Criddle

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/514634#Comment_514634

But today I was looking at Acts 13:32 and it took me to "Additional Notes".

That's a BECNT volume I don't have[:)]

But from my post above it looks as though Logos are handling different volumes differently. Hopefully they will see this and comment on what the overall policy is - and whether it is being adhered to.

Ritchin Eapen Sen

https://community.logos.com/discussion/comment/514637#Comment_514637

Makes sense. Thanks for taking the time to look into this issue, Graham. Now the waiting game begins! [:D]