I search Byz for <Lemma = lbs/el/ποιέω> BEFORE (sin, truth, righteousness) [by mistake] and amazingly it worked [even though English words were involved in the search]. Why did this happen?
Kind of like a reverse-reverse interlinear.
The tagging beneath the text contains Strongs numbering, English glosses, and parsing (morphology). Any of those fields can be used in a search.
You can see the available search fields by clicking the little circled i in the right hand top corner of the "locator bar"
EDIT: this extensive tagging is a key part of the reason that Logos resources sometimes cost more than other companies. All of that tagging takes work, and a worker is worth his/her wages. :-)
Thanks.
I'm not sure I fully understand how it works - but it's very nice.
TC,
I could be wrong and if I weren't so tired from burning the candle at both ends I would check prior to posting. But, I think that it is bc it is linked to a reverse interlinear that it does work.
In other words see what would happen if you did the same search against the Byz alone. I don't think it would yield the same results. Just my foggy understanding.
It is like an interlinear but nothing is displayed except the manuscript. But if you hover over a word the tip will show you the available information. You can search a lot of Greek bibles with an English word (gloss) e.g. NA27, SBLGNT as well as NA27 Int.
Dave,
Because I am tender towards challenges I tested my theory with data. I did a search on Matt 2.7 lemma kaleo in the Byz alone first and it returned a greek reply, I then added the interlinear this time NASB95 and revealed the data returned was nonsense. Your serve.
I did a search on Matt 2.7 lemma kaleo in the Byz alone first and it returned a greek reply, I then added the interlinear this time NASB95 and revealed the data returned was nonsense.
I agree! This is the result you should have got
The result you got in Byz was the same as searching for <lemma = lbs/el/καλέω> alone, because you don't have results in two colours!
Are you tricking me or do you have a weird version of Byz; here's mine from the Info page:-
LLS:1.0.3312014-04-24T23:21:50ZBYZPRSD.logos4
After careful consideration of all the points raised I conclude that we all have raised relevant issues. I therefor conclude that we should end by tipping our hats to George who would insist that there is no replacement for a thorough understanding of the language in question which reverse interlinears cannot replace. [8-|]
After careful consideration of all the points raised
You haven't answered my question re your results in Byz.
My Byz is Textform 2005 as shown, yours appears to be different. As you have correctly indicated it is searching on the manuscript form not the lemmas. I hope this satisfactorily accounts for the discrepancy you object to.
yours appears to be different.
If you display the Support Info as I did, we can know for sure.
I don't think you're going to be happy because they're not the same, but here you go:
If you display the Support Info as I did, we can know for sure. Dave, I don't think you're going to be happy because they're not the same, but here you go:
Sorry Beloved, he means open the Ntg Byz you've got up there, and in the address bar of the resource click the . This will "flip the page" and show you the resource version information. This is what Dave is hoping to compare.
Thank you TC,
Now that Dave's request is clear, here you go:
