New Feature: NOT search operators

Philana R. Crouch

The following new NOT operators were added to 7.10 Beta 1: NOT INTERSECTS, NOT BEFORE, NOT AFTER, NOT WITHIN, NOT NEAR

Also added aliases for some existing operators:

NOT AND is the same as ANDNOT
AND NOT is the same as ANDNOT
NOT ANDEQUALS is the same as NOTEQUALS
NOT EQUALS is the same as NOTEQUALS
EQUALS is the same as ANDEQUALS

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Dave Hooton

At last!

Francis

Good.

Now what we need is ALL/ANY for tagged entities (e.g., <Person ALL>) and searches can be fully functional.

SineNomine

Excellent news.

Bonus points to the first person to create and post an authentically useful search string that employs all five of the new operators.

Tim Hensler

Now what we need is ALL/ANY for tagged entities (e.g., <Person ALL>)

YES!!! PLEASE!!!

Dave Hooton

Bonus points to the first person to create and post an authentically useful search string that employs all five of the new operators.

(lord,god) NOT AFTER light NOT BEFORE created NOT NEAR heaven NOT INTERSECTS {Section <Culture Moral corruption>} NOT WITHIN <LDHB = Reported Speech>

Phil Gons (Logos)

Now what we need is ALL/ANY for tagged entities (e.g., <Person ALL>)

YES!!! PLEASE!!!

We're looking into this as possible Q4 search improvement. Thanks for the suggestion/reminder.

Dave Hooton

Bonus points to the first person to create and post an authentically useful search string that employs all five of the new operators.

I'm waiting!

Harry Hahne

The following new NOT operators were added to 7.10 Beta 1: NOT INTERSECTS, NOT BEFORE, NOT AFTER, NOT WITHIN, NOT NEAR

Sweet! I am so happy to see this.

A rough and ready Visual Filter for anarthrous Greek nouns is now possible:

@N NOT AFTER 1 WORD @D

It is not perfect, since it does not take into consideration that the article may be separated from the noun by more than one word. But as a visual filter it saves a lot of time.

Now, if we just had command line morphological agreement....

Bruce Dunning

This is a great addition.

Keep Smiling 4 Jesus :)

Now, if we just had command line morphological agreement....

Command line disagreement is doable for anarthrous Greek nouns => Anarthrous Greek nouns Visual Filter

Faithlife Group Logos Visual Filters has "Logos Greek Morphology - Noun: Anarthrous (English)" and "Logos Greek Morphology - Noun: Anarthrous (Greek)" shared documents.

Keep Smiling [:)]

Harry Hahne

Now, if we just had command line morphological agreement....

Command line disagreement is doable for anarthrous Greek nouns => Anarthrous Greek nouns Visual Filter

Faithlife Group Logos Visual Filters has "Logos Greek Morphology - Noun: Anarthrous (English)" and "Logos Greek Morphology - Noun: Anarthrous (Greek)" shared documents.

Keep Smiling

True. But it is time consuming and error-prone to have to enter every permutation of word combinations.

For what its worth, Bible Works has a concise method of specifying morphological agreement/disagreement of desired morphological features in command line searches. The Graphical Search Engine (which is similar to what was in Logos Libronix 3.0) is more powerful, but at least the possibility is there in command line searches.

Keep Smiling 4 Jesus :)

True. But it is time consuming and error-prone to have to enter every permutation of word combinations.

Concur creating visual filter searches was time consuming plus checked/verified article/noun combinations several times for agreement correctness. Thankful anarthrous visual filters can be freely copied (and modified as desired: e.g. highlighting). Due to word order differences in English and Greek, created different visual filters.

Keep Smiling [:)]