Bug in clause search: to feel (emotion) not available

Page 1 of 1 (4 items)
This post has 3 Replies | 2 Followers

Posts 13360
Forum MVP
Mark Barnes | Forum Activity | Posted: Wed, Jul 4 2018 11:56 PM

The sense  to feel (emotion) is not available in the clause search, perhaps because it is a top level entry? 

Posts 22
LogosEmployee
Jimmy Parks | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, Jul 5 2018 5:20 PM

I get results with this search. 

Posts 754
LogosEmployee
Sean Boisen | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, Jul 5 2018 7:19 PM

This works for me in Clause Search: note the syntax is different to what's in Bible search (though the Search Helps cookbook examples indicate that).

However, the drop-down entry helper unhelpfully provides an incorrect completion (an extra space after the left paren, the trailing colon, and the lack of the closing right paren). So if you accept that, you're right, it won't work.

I'll report this bug.

Posts 13360
Forum MVP
Mark Barnes | Forum Activity | Replied: Fri, Jul 6 2018 7:03 AM

Sean Boisen:
This works for me in Clause Search:

You're right that if you type it in manually, it works, but I'm not seeing the auto complete for either SBLGNT or LHB.

Sean Boisen:
However, the drop-down entry helper unhelpfully provides an incorrect completion (an extra space after the left paren, the trailing colon, and the lack of the closing right paren).

I don't think it's actually autocompleting for that sense (hence the red text), it's just widly guessing what you might want.

I wonder if the reason it's not coming up in the autocomplete is that there are no lemmas for that sense (only for sub-senses).

Page 1 of 1 (4 items) | RSS