Data BUG (LHB-CA): Lergameh/Paseq indistinction

Page 1 of 1 (3 items)
This post has 2 Replies | 0 Followers

Posts 1998
Forum MVP
Reuben Helmuth | Forum Activity | Posted: Wed, Jan 16 2019 4:53 AM

Here's another problem that's covered in the Resolving Ambiguities section, yet all occurrences of either one are tagged with both, making it impossible to do reliable searches.

Posts 1289
LogosEmployee
Rick Brannan (Faithlife) | Forum Activity | Replied: Wed, Feb 20 2019 9:34 AM

Hi Reuben.

This one is a little more complicated from my perspective.

When you say "legarmeh", you mean in prose the "Munah Legarmeh", and in poetry the "Mahpakh Legarmeh", correct?

So, in prose, when a Munah Legarmeh also has Munnach and Paseq annotated, the Munnach and Paseq need to be removed (but Munah Legarmeh persists).

Similarly, in poetry, when a Mahpahk Legarmeh has Mahpahk and Paseq annotated, the Mahpahk and Paseq need to be removed (but Mahpahk Legarmeh persists).

Is this correct?

Rick Brannan
Data Wrangler, Faithlife
My books in print

Posts 1998
Forum MVP
Reuben Helmuth | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Feb 26 2019 11:39 AM

Rick, you're right that this one is a bit more complicated. According to Helmut Richter, it's impossible to ascertain which it is without looking at the words themselves.

 

Rick Brannan (Faithlife):
When you say "legarmeh", you mean in prose the "Munah Legarmeh", and in poetry the "Mahpakh Legarmeh", correct?

Yes.

Rick Brannan (Faithlife):
So, in prose, when a Munah Legarmeh also has Munnach and Paseq annotated, the Munnach and Paseq need to be removed (but Munah Legarmeh persists).

This is correct, with the caveat that only if it's been correctly tagged as Munah Legarmeh.

Page 1 of 1 (3 items) | RSS