For now, there are mytag, communitytag, and tag (union of previous 2).
For rating, there's only myrating, rating.
Could you consider adding communityrating support?
It will be interesting to add a logic such as communityrating > myrating, etc. for comparison too.
Kolen Cheung: For rating, there's only myrating, rating. Could you consider adding communityrating support?
rating: is Community Rating. It is supposed to show in the Rating column for your unrated books, but that isn't happening. And the only meaningful comparison is myrating:0 rating:x; where you increase x from 1 to 5 to get a result!
Dave===
Windows 10 & Android 8
Dave Hooton:rating: is Community Rating.
I don't think it is true. rating is myrating if myrating exist else communityrating. There's no way to obtain the communityrating regardless of myrating.
communityrating already is a supported search field. The problem is that while myrating is an whole number value, communityrating is a decimal value. So, you won't find many results searching for something like communityrating:4 (although there will be some) Instead, search for communityrating:>3.4 AND communityrating:<4.5
Ok, thanks! I guess then it is just a documentation issue. Are there exact match syntax as well? Trying {CommunityRating "3.1"} doesn't yield anything.
Kolen Cheung: Ok, thanks! I guess then it is just a documentation issue. Are there exact match syntax as well? Trying {CommunityRating "3.1"} doesn't yield anything.
The field syntax is an exact match, so there is no need for the extension syntax.
I've had a question about community ratings that I thought I'd ask here: does this rating come from other users' Logos libraries or from the review ratings on logos.com?
Kolen Cheung: Dave Hooton:rating: is Community Rating. I don't think it is true. rating is myrating if myrating exist else communityrating. There's no way to obtain the communityrating regardless of myrating.
Thanks for that. I've updated the wiki to reflect this discussion.
Dave Hooton:Thanks for that. I've updated the wiki to reflect this discussion.
Thanks. I also see that you've added the undocumented "exact match" syntax in the wiki. It's very helpful and much appreciated.