SUGGESTION: MIA which shouldn't be - reverse interlinears

Page 1 of 1 (2 items)
This post has 1 Reply | 1 Follower

Posts 28696
Forum MVP
MJ. Smith | Forum Activity | Posted: Sun, Oct 13 2019 12:29 AM

In documenting the reverse interlinears, something that FL has allowed to slide since their last push on documentation, I discovered two very annoying instances of missing data:

  • The ESV has a reverse interlinear but its apocrypha does not. This is most annoying as the ESV is preferred to the RSV, NRSV among some Protestants. It's easier to have cross-denominational discussions when one is able to use the others translation.
  • The D-R lacks a reverse interlinear attached to the Vulgate. Especially when the Vulgate interlinear lacks a literal translation (this doesn't bother me but was brought up recently in the forums.) But having our primary Vulgate translation aligned with the Vulgate is critical.

Orthodox Bishop Hilarion Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."

Posts 52
LW | Forum Activity | Replied: Tue, Oct 15 2019 10:24 PM

Good points.Yes

Page 1 of 1 (2 items) | RSS