New Prepub Request - Logos for Linux

David J. Ring, Jr.
David J. Ring, Jr. Member Posts: 146 ✭✭
edited December 2024 in English Forum

Pre-pub request.

To settle the question of if it would be profitable to produce a copy of Libronix for the Linux  / Unix operating system - even if it is a console type program, I would like to ask Mr. Bob P. if he would consider placing "Logos for Linux / Unix" on the pre-pub list for "Gathering Interest" and if sufficient interest is expressed, produce it - even if users have to subsidize the program by paying for it.

Many small netbook computers run Linux like a racehorse - very fast - and I believe in the near future that there may well be an increase in users of this operating system.

I'd like to suggest - perhaps as a beginning - to produce a stripped down version of Libronix - simply one that worked  both in console and X server modes (or just console if need  be) which would open up our books and search.  Similar to Logos 2.0.

Perhaps the Pre-Pub would be aimed at the small linux netbooks and include the a Bible that is available in many languages.  Such would be invaluable to missionaries who are involved with the OLPC http://laptop.org/en/  program.

In any event, such a listing for a pre-pub would give solid evidence to Logos management if this project would be worthwhile for them to harness their precious resources of manpower, equipment and time to this end..

Sincerely,

DJJ Ring, Jr.

Green Harbor, MA

USA

 

«1

Comments

  • Bob Pritchett
    Bob Pritchett Member, Logos Employee Posts: 2,280

    That's a great idea, and I'd do it if I thought there was even remotely enough interest.

    But I've got a few facts that make it clear this is not yet profitable.

    A) I know how much we sell to Windows users. I know how much we sell to Mac users. I know the relative market share of those platforms on the desktop, and my sales breakdown follows the industry stats. Plugging the Linux market share into this indicates Linux sales of...well, not nearly enough. And while Mac users have a reputation for spending MORE on software than Windows users, Linux users have a reputation for being Linux users because they don't like to pay for software at all. (Yeah, I know, it's because Windows is bad code, Microsoft is evil, and Apple is too cool / expensive / pretty / whatever. (Actually, why don't Linux users just become Mac users? It's Unix, there's no Bill Gates...  :-) ))

    B) I know how many lines of code we have. I know how many lines of code a programmer can port / write / debug in a day. I know what a programmer costs per day (!). I know we've never had any pre-pub, of any book or product, return enough to cover this cost.

    C) The pre-pub already exists. At:

    http://www.codeweavers.com/compatibility/browse/name/?app_id=321

    you will find a pledging system for getting Logos Bible Software running under CrossOver. It's got 19 pledges at $1,793.90, and I'm pretty sure that I represent at least $500 of that. Get the pledges over $250,000 and we'll believe there's a viable market. And so will Codeweavers. You'll probably get it fast. :-)

    D) I know we're going to let people access (most of) their Logos content via the web in the future. Linux users (and BeOS users!) will be supported here for no more investment then we'll need to support Windows and Mac, and this seems like the most cost effective solution. I'm sorry it's not ready yet.

    -- Bob

     

  • jcc
    jcc Member Posts: 39 ✭✭
    Item D is really good to hear. It will allow access through all kinds of mobile devices that are getting more popular. Will it enable offline mode if I want to access my books without connecting to the internet through the browser interface if I have the book file and license file off-line?
  • TCBlack
    TCBlack Member Posts: 10,980 ✭✭✭

    I'm just going to mark this post as a favorite.  Thanks Bob.

    As you've stated elsewhere, WINE/Codeweavers is an option and one that I've been working at for some time - with too little result.

    Hmm Sarcasm is my love language. Obviously I love you. 

  • David J. Ring, Jr.
    David J. Ring, Jr. Member Posts: 146 ✭✭

    Bob,

    Put a Logos "Pre-Pub" up for Linux version - I bet you will get a much different response.

    If I'm wrong - you've wasted not much time and even less money.

    I think a DOS type of program would be nice - but I guess the old Logos 2.0 version wouldn't work with the newer books - if it would it would enable lots of those little Linux netbooks to work like the eePC and MSI Wind.

    Why not, Bob, put up a pre-pub - if your old Logos 2.0 code was written in some sort of language that can be recompiled easily to Linux (there are lots of compilers out there - python, C, C++, perl, ruby, etc.

    If it works and you make even enough money to pay for the work it will open up a new market - the missionaries will want ALL the nice books and the parishioners would want a few books.

    Then again, if the interest is few, you haven't invested more than a few electrons on your web page.

    If it really kicks off, and you can make it pay - those people are happy, and it probably will open up a new market.  I'm sure if you sold 50,000 copies of one book and the Linux software you'd be happy - not to mention the public relations bonus of being THE company who opened up the small Linux netbooks that are to be distributed in the 3rd world.

    It sounds like a good solution.

    WINE is good but it is a large program - a native program with cut down features with low memory requirements would be the way to go in my opinion.

    Why not ask your head of programming if the old Logos 2.0 program can be ported or re-compiled.  If it can, then some of the early Logos books can be used.

    Maybe also you might have "how much would you be willing to pay for this" option to see if that would make it profitable.

    Give it a try - it doesn't have to be the bells and whistles of Libronix - it can just be good old Logos 2.0 which was very fast even on Windows 3.0.

    And if it doesn't get much attention - you'll have a perfect link to show us - "Hey, too few wanted it" - but untested waters may prove to be a different depth than you or I think.

    Of course, I'm hoping for deep waters - but it may very well turn out to be the 1% your research says.  I can eat humble pie - if I bring  enough ketchup and soy sauce!

     

    Best

     

    David

  • Anonymous
    Anonymous Member Posts: 879 ✭✭

    Please forgive a newbie. While I support for a Linux port and since the windows version has (apparent) problems, could an alternative be to run the Mac version through PearPC or equivalent in the meantime?

  • Steven Yu
    Steven Yu Member Posts: 212 ✭✭

    Actually I quite like the idea of have a Linux Engine listed as a pre-pub, even most of the people in Linux are aware of WINE and Codeweaver project, but Logos is the company behind it, and should be the central point for all discussion in regards to the future of libronix engine.

    "And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free", John 8:32.
    "你們必定認識真理,真理必定使你們自由", 約翰福音 8:3.

  • Mark
    Mark Member Posts: 2,662 ✭✭✭

    I have always been interested in Libronix on Linux and I did not know of the WINE and Codeweaver project.  Just to let you know.  I like the idea of putting it up for pre pub to see who (like me) is in the woodwork that would support it.

    However, according to Bob, the future lies with cloud computing and this is what he said in his point D.  Therefore, it should not matter in the future. 

    What does matter for most of us is that we have invested thousands already in having the resources OFFLINE and those resources we would like to keep and not see our investment going up in smoke (or in the clouds).  If we choose to stop investing and keep what we have, will there always be support for what we already own offlline?

    Bob, I did appreciate your response very much.

    Mark

  • Timothy Ha
    Timothy Ha Member Posts: 431 ✭✭

    If Logos 4 will be built on .Net, then Mono may help it run in Linux.

    JesusChrist.ru - Russian Christian Portal, with free Bible software; Timh.ru - blog

  • James W Bennett
    James W Bennett Member Posts: 308 ✭✭

    To settle the question of if it would be profitable to produce a copy of Libronix for the Linux  / Unix operating system - even if it is a console type program, I would like to ask Mr. Bob P. if he would consider placing "Logos for Linux / Unix" on the pre-pub list for "Gathering Interest" and if sufficient interest is expressed, produce it - even if users have to subsidize the program by paying for it.

     

    Unfortunately there is a problem with making a pre-pub for a Linux version of Libronix. Pre-pub is set to gather monetary interest in a product and let Logos know when there is enough potential capital to make the project viable. Logos does not charge for the Libronix software. They only charge for the books. Thus even having 1000 people say they are interested in having a Linux version of Libronix means $0 calculable revenue for Logos. They would have to know what those users wanted to purchase. And many of those users probably already have many of the books they want.

    With that said, Bob's reference to the Codeweaver site is probably the best way that Logos could offer the community the possibility of a Linux version of Libronix.

    ---

    James W Bennett

    http://syriac.tara-lu.com/

  • David J. Ring, Jr.
    David J. Ring, Jr. Member Posts: 146 ✭✭

    The pre-pub could include the KJV and Strong's numbers modules.

    I'd pay $150 for a copy of a Linux version of this program.

    I'd contribute $250 if LOGOS would buy one of the small OLPC laptops - and include a copy of the Linux LOGOS program and send it to a missionary in need of such who is working in the field.  In fact, I'd give $150 plus the cost of the small Linux laptop plus airmail to the missionary - that would be better.

    For years missionaries have wished for such.  The small netbooks that are being released are very efficient - and can be powered by a combination of a solar panel and their internal battery for hours.

    The Zip-It Internet device has great potential - it is $50 or less.  See http://hunterdavis.com/archives/201#more-201

    Using Codeweaver or WINE means that larger laptops have to be used.

    If some of the programmers who wrote the Logos 2.0 code are still around, they might be able to port their work to Linux - these small machines could use that size program - and the Logos 2.0 code was very very fast and small - no bloat.

    No one will ever know unless such a proposal is hoisted up the flagpole.

    Put a price of $150 up there - make a X-Windows version of the code and a console version (even if simpler) of the code.  Blind people often like console programs because they don't have to play "Pin the Mouse on the Window" by blindly moving the mouse around.  With a console program (think DOS programs like WordPerfect) the commands are all key strokes. - and screen readers can read console - and do so with very little memory use.


    Of course, if you're talking about a full-blown Linux desktop like Gnome (which is excellent) - their handicapped extensions managed by Orca will read and magnify everything very well.

    Bob, try it - put $150 for the price - or even $200.  How many will it take to justify development? 1,000 or 2,000 - that would be $400,000 at the higher numbers - I'm guessing that the work could be done and profitably (which is a good thing).  Without profit, you cannot make the trip to market and we all suffer the loss.

    Maybe a few more books could be added for that price - or a "gift" certificate could be included for some books.  It sure would be nice to have.

    I'm guessing that while Linux might have an overall market share of 1%, in this particular market, it may well be significantly more - or there might be hundreds of users who would make the leap to Linux if everything they needed was available there.

    Linux has Firefox, OpenOffice which is Microsoft Office compatable, GIMP which is like Photoshop, Inkscape like Illustrator - plus there are many ARTISTIC programs in Linux which do NOT have an equal in Windows or MAC - I was amazed when I learned this.

    Plus Linux still has a console - and as I said blind users and computers with low horsepower just love the console.

    Why not run it up the flagpole?  I don't want you to do it if you cannot make a profit - that would be suicidal - but perhaps the market is larger than you might expect because you are dealing with a niche within a niche.

    As I said - I'd pay twice the price if you could give the program to a missionary organization - that would double your money flow - perhaps put that as a sub option - and if it is checked it means "twice the number of copies sold".

    It doesn't cost much to put it up on pre-pub - and the idea does have its supporters.  Perhaps a missionary organization will say "I'll buy 2,000 if they will run on a small Linux laptop" - who knows!

    Be well,

    David

  • Donovan R. Palmer
    Donovan R. Palmer Member, MVP Posts: 2,886

    It doesn't cost much to put it up on pre-pub - and the idea does have its supporters.  Perhaps a missionary organization will say "I'll buy 2,000 if they will run on a small Linux laptop" - who knows!

    Trouble is knowing whether or not there would be enough income to justify supporting it long term, with further development and maintenance releases. If the user base is small that it doesn't buy books (which is reportedly where Logos makes its real money), there won't be enough of a revenue stream to keep it going.

    Anyhow, I think the CrossWeavers thing is a brilliant way to explore this.

     

  • Bobby Terhune
    Bobby Terhune Member Posts: 700 ✭✭✭

    David,

    Perhaps it would be more profitable to take your request to the different missionary boards that support the efforts of the missionaries you have a burden for. Getting a number of organizations together to suppport development could be a powerful thing.  

  • David J. Ring, Jr.
    David J. Ring, Jr. Member Posts: 146 ✭✭

    I'm sure that Bob Pritchett


    is still reading this thread - since he responded earlier. 

    Since Mr. Pritchett  is the President of LOGOS, he could put up a "Pre-Pub" for Logos - perhaps a "basic" edition including some books.

    I'm sure - since he is an excellent businessman - mulling this over and perhaps gathering information about this.

    I'd love for him and his devoted colleagues at LOGOS to find that this would be profitable for them..

    He's listed pre-pubs that he never thought would publish - but because of the interest, they did publish.

    He's also listed pre-pubs that he really wanted to publish and they did NOT publish.  One that I really wanted was about the values and customs of Biblical civilization - a very interesting book - that was too big to "just publish" - but unfortunately never gathered sufficient interest - it was a large book and one that would have required a huge amount of work.

    As for searching out missionary organizations and asking them to beat the bushes - they've done so already and they're using what is available.  Xiphos - formerly Gnome Sword, and others.  Not to slight Xiphos (disclaimer I worked on this project) which is very good, it is not what LOGOS is - nor is it even what LOGOS 2.0 was, nor does it have access to other e-books.

    Libronix finds itself today at a crossroads - Google has just announced that  Google's online service Google Editions  http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jBk6at86CXPNhbwPQZT99rTLVvuQ which will support Digital Rights Media (DRM) as well as plain old non-copyright books.  They polan on having 1.5 million books available by next year.

    Authors, software makers, artists all work very hard to create a good product that is enjoyed by many.  If they can't make money at it, they will have to abandon their chosen vocation - which is a shame.  God gave us talents, we should use them, we should if we chose use them to earn our livelihood.  Jesus was a carpenter; the apostles, fishermen, tax collectors, etc.   I am happy and proud that the men and women at LOGOS are using the gifts that God gave them to earn their living and to give us products we can use in our daily work and lives.

    My opinion is that development (if any) of a Linux minimal version - a console version that will work in console or in a window - will be a good choice.  I think it might take too  much work to change code just so CodeWeavers or WINE will work with it since WINE and CodeWeavers constantly evolves - and a program that worked on an earlier version of WINE (which stands for:  WINE Is Not an Emulator - runs MS Windows apps on Linux).

    If the product costs more than about $150, then it would be more cost efficient for Linux users (but not the small horsepower computer device users) to just buy Windows and do a "dual boot" - it just seems wasteful to buy Windows 7 to run LOGOS / Libronix. 

    I'd rather give that $150 to LOGOS than to Microsoft - not because I dislike Microsoft, but it is LOGOS I want to use, not Windows.  I have no programs other than Logos that I need Windows for.

    If LOGOS comes out with a small program that runs on Google Editions reader, I'll buy one.  If they come out with a Linux program - I'll buy that.

    I've already ordered Windows 7 - and I have a 30 GB partition made on my hard drive - just to install Logos - seems wasteful to me - that's a lot of space just for an operating system.  (I found out later, I probably should have ordered the 32 bit version as it needed a bit less space).  I'll have 10 GB left over for books.

    Be well,

    David


  • jcc
    jcc Member Posts: 39 ✭✭
    How about releasing just a module or specs can decrypt the book files if people have licenses available and let the linux community build their own interface around that with their open source mentality. I know personally I wouldn't have the time to devote to that project (maybe except just a reader). After all, you are giving the libronix engine away for free anyway, if the interest are out there, then let the community develop the linux version for you.
  • Daniel Lee
    Daniel Lee Member Posts: 274 ✭✭

    This is not going to be acceptable to the publishers and other sources from whom Logos is licensing the books, nor to Logos as an organization.  DRM is not ideal for the consumer since it limits on what what devices and how a file, document, or module can be used; however, since digital information doesn't work like a regular book, they have to have some mechanism to restrict copying, or trust in people to be honest.  People aren't honest, so some mechanism has to stay in place.  Publishing specs for the module or how to decrypt the files would allow anyone with enough skill to bypass the copying restrictions, and human nature being what it is, why pay for something when you can get it for free?  This is not good business for Logos, nor is it reasonable.  Giving away the engine for Windows is not the same thing as giving people a means for decrypting all the book files; Logos makes money from the books, and taking away their ability to do so means all of us lose out.

  • Michael Kares
    Michael Kares Member Posts: 506 ✭✭

    Has anyone tried running Logos 2.0 under WINE?  It just might work.  Problem would be solved

     

    Blessings,

    Michael Kares

  • David J. Ring, Jr.
    David J. Ring, Jr. Member Posts: 146 ✭✭

    Hello Michael,

    I've tried Logos 2.0 under WINE - I forget the file that causes all the problems - it is an executive that is chainloaded from logos.exe - black-something comes to mind - I don't have the program in front of me.

    I wonder if some sort of BOOK-SAFE can be made - but since LOGOS gives the books updates for free, I'd hate to see someone fool the BOOK-SAFE into giving permission to the reader without payment.

    It certainly can be done in some way - we have to be sure that authors, coders, managers, illustrators continue to be able to learn their living.  Without their gifts, we would have no beautiful books.

    Some sort of BOOK-SAFE in which the reader requests to read a book.  The BOOK-SAFE would have to query the license key, and send access to the reader.  This part of the program would have to remain closed code because without such security, LOGOS or other publishers would be unable to provide high quality books, and pay the authors and illustrators.

    But once the reader has access to the book, I don't see any problem with it being Open Source.  In fact, LOGOS probably should head up the project to make sure that it has 100% compatability with the BOOK-SAFE.  The reader could be used to access free ASCII and pdf files.

    I think it would be to LOGOS's benefit to make the BOOK-SAFE compatable with other publisher's selected security - and they could license the BOOK-SAFE to those publishers - but LOGOS because it is involved with this program would show the other publishers that Libronix system would integrate their books into a Library that could be searched and work together. 

    I think the time is near when LOGOS will have to decide to do something like this - because the Google Reader will be a challenge simply because of the number of books that it will be able to read. 

    I think Google is planning to buy into a world-wide network - probably on the cellular frequencies - where the book can be bought by the user and downloaded immediately.  LOGOS could do that also - and that's what it needs to do to complete with Cloud technologies.

    However in some places in the world, there are missionaries without cell phone coverage - deep into the jungle!

    One of the surprising things about the world-wide cellular network is that in remote areas, it has surpassed the traditional wired network with wooden poles and miles of copper.  In densely populated areas, the converse is true:   The areas are being strung with fiber optic cable - and the bandwidth is tremendous - but the cost is terrific.  But if they can get everyone to subscribe to the fiber optic, they will amortize their costs.  It is a good gamble for the telephone companies who already own the backbone of the Internet - now they've got the local area covered.

    Also if LOGOS was involved in the open source group - they could find some very talented coders - and they could HIRE them.  Of course, they'd have to do a psychological screening of them to ensure that they don't quit and then break the code publically.  That would be terrible.

    But you're right - there is a lot of talent out there - but it is very important to make sure that the books are secure - there are different ways of doing this which I wouldn't discuss on a public forum, but you're right it can be done - and it would make a very interesting project that I'm sure would be mutually beneficial to Libronix, in fact it may very well be the life preserver that they need to stay competitive in the publishing business that is just about to experience a radical change similar to the change from hot type to cold type (from hot forged metal lead slugs to computer generated material and computer driven printing presses).

    Be well,

    DR

    David J. Ring, Jr.

    Founding Partner

    Phoenix Advanced Technologies

    =30=

  • Ross Durham
    Ross Durham Member Posts: 121 ✭✭

    What is the time frame for D)?  This obviously allow us be OS agnostic and we'll all be happy.  Is Libronix 4.0 first, then D)?  Libronix is really the only reason I'm not always on some variety of Unix; money is the main reason I am not on Mac. 

  • David J. Ring, Jr.
    David J. Ring, Jr. Member Posts: 146 ✭✭

    There are some fabulous programs on Linux - and contrary to what some think, some are quite costly.

    Take for example: http://www.supernec.com/price.htm

    Which costs between $6,000 and $1200 depending on features.

    They've managed to produce license codes on Linux which are machine dependent and can be used on only one machine.

    I have the inexpensive version - but I've already paid much more for Logos - so the question isn't one about money, although I feel that for some reason - and the lack of even putting a Linux Package of Books on pre-pub is related to a concern for money - I can think of nothing that explain the failure to try.

    Somethings I don't need to investigate in order to know they're a bad idea - like plunging 200 feet down off a building, but there are some things which are safe to try to gather information.

    There would be NO commitment on the part of the publisher for just putting a $200 Libronix / Linux Collection up on Pre-Pub.

    Bob (he that must be obeyed at Logos) was reading this thread, I can't see why he won't try - he would only be out the cost of email and web space and whatever administrative costs there might be in collecting pre-pub interest --

    After all, there have been some surprises before?

    Bob, would you try?

    Thanks,

    David

     

  • David J. Ring, Jr.
    David J. Ring, Jr. Member Posts: 146 ✭✭

    That's a great idea, and I'd do it if I thought there was even remotely enough interest.***

    -- Bob

    Bob,

    Why not try a pre-pub announcement for a small Linux Logos set of books at a price of $200?

    You already said you'd do it if there was enough interest.

    This is a chance to do a real market survey - it a necessary part for any intelligent business plan.

    It might very well be another source of revenue for Logos / Libronix.

    But without trying to fly such a pre-pub, you'll really never know because few people read this forum compared to those who receive your email announcements o pre-pubs.

    I've bought a few of the pre-pubs myself, and I'd like to buy this.

    Be well,

    David

  • MJ. Smith
    MJ. Smith MVP Posts: 54,948

    D) I know we're going to let people access (most of) their Logos content via the web in the future.

    In this context, it would be well worth a reasonable fee to have access to the Biblical scholarship on subscription journal sites.

    Orthodox Bishop Alfeyev: "To be a theologian means to have experience of a personal encounter with God through prayer and worship."; Orthodox proverb: "We know where the Church is, we do not know where it is not."

  • David J. Ring, Jr.
    David J. Ring, Jr. Member Posts: 146 ✭✭

    MJ Smith,

    That's a wonderful idea.   That's one of the points of a "sub thread" I introduced in this discussion - the revolultionary change in publishing - it's happening as we speak with the newspapers.  I want decent, honest, balanced media that's searching for the truth - and willing to bring me all the facts.  I'll pay for it.  I live in a town where the better of two newspapers doesn't confine its editorial position to the editorial page, but it creeps in and constantly slants the reporting, the other doesn't meet my needs - so my needs go unfulfilled.  There is a distant paper that doesn't circulate here (who's circulation is growing by leaps and bounds) that I cannot get except by mail, and still it doesn't cover the local area.

    This is part of the information revolution - it involves all types of media and how we access it.  If I have a budget of $XXXX a year I'd rather pay vendors of information premium prices rather than operating systems.  I have Linux and it runs rings around Windows 7 Release Candidate - even though Win7 is quite stable -at least with minimal programs installed.  Unfortunately Windows OS still allows vendors of software modification abilities to change the DLL files which often conflict with other programs, slowing down the computer, or even crashing it.  With Linux this doesn't happen, nor does Linux suffer fragmentation hard drive problems because the ext3 file system was built to avoid that problem.  Plus I get access to thousands of programs that do what I want, and if I want to modify them for my use, I can.

    The focus is going to be on content and how we access it.  If LOGOS can produce an engine (perhaps in perl, ruby or java) that will run platform independent, they win.  If they can allow me to buy content over the Internet and open it efficiently with my PDA, cellphone, desktop, laptop - or even a reading appliance of some type, they'll be the winner.  Content will be cloud based and available for purchase.  The engines that perform actions on the content will be in the reader.

    Thanks MJ,

    I really hope Bob is still reading this - there are some excellent ideas worthy of his consideration - and hopefully with some market  research he will continue to lead the way in electronic books and expand it (hopefully) to be the format of choice for all electronic media - or at least produce a reader that will handle all formats - and the market will see how much better his format is.

    A platform independent program to process the media on the reader (computer, pda, cellphone) would be perfect - but make sure we have a Logos "buy it here" button.

    Be well,

    DR

     

  • jcc
    jcc Member Posts: 39 ✭✭
    Here is an interesting statistic:

    http://2dboy.com/2009/10/26/pay-what-you-want-birthday-sale-wrap-up/

    The number of Linux users are about the same as the MAC users AND they are willing to pay more.
  • Nigel Cunningham
    Nigel Cunningham Member Posts: 181 ✭✭

    Hi Bob.

    In response to your points...

    A) Do you count me as a Windows user at the moment in your statistics? I suspect you would, because I'm using Vista so I can run Dragon Naturally Speaking and Logos. In actual fact, though, they're running under Linux via VMware. Go and take a look at my licenses (nandmcunningham@yahoo.com). Every title that's been purchased since 2001 has been purchased for use under Linux, using Win4Lin or (more recently) VMware. You're making money from Linux users today. Your statistics are just not showing you the truth, and we're working around the lack.

    B) Yeah, not that many LOC :) (I've worked in software development). But please, give the prepub a try. Even if you put a nice high price on it to just get the people who are really serious and say clearly that you're just 'Gathering Interest' and won't necessarily produce it, even if it gets to 100%. Or you could do a Community Pricing one! :)

    C) As far as Wine goes, it doesn't work. I've tried to get it to install (recently), without success. Pointers would be appreciated.

    D) Web only works if your internet connection is fast and reliable... and if Logos' servers are reliable.

  • Dan Francis
    Dan Francis Member Posts: 5,336 ✭✭✭

    Pre-pub is set to gather monetary interest in a product and let Logos know when there is enough potential capital to make the project viable. Logos does not charge for the Libronix software. They only charge for the books.

     

    That is not entirely true I am a mac user and logos charges all mac users for their engine. It could work bu the problem is one of numbers, although since the macintosh is a unix kernel perhaps the mac code could be ported more easily. But as has been posted here Linux users can run VMware and windows under it. I don;t call it an ideal solution but unless linux users are willing to pay like mac users have I wouldn't expect to see a LInux version for a few years, it has taken over 10 years to convince Logos to ma one for us. I am not saying they shouldn't do one but just want to say it could take a while.

     

     

  • David J. Ring, Jr.
    David J. Ring, Jr. Member Posts: 146 ✭✭

    Note:  I sent Bob a CC: of the submission here by direct email as it seemed that he hadn't been able to read this thread.  I made my best pitch concerning this, and he (in the email below) gave me his best answer.  I'm sharing it with the other readers of this thread.

    Most often the first few exchanges - or even just the first message carry most of the importance of the discussion.

    I know (and hope) that he is busy producing his continued excellent product, and I thank him for the time and thought he has given to this.

    Best wishes,

    David Ring

     

    from Bob Pritchett <-------@logos.com>

    to David Ring <------@arrl.net>

    date Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 7:37 PM

    subject RE: Bob Bob Bob - Good Morning - Bob Bob Bob


    Sent at 7:37 PM (6 hours ago)  


    I appreciate your enthusiasm, but based on our Mac porting experience, we're looking at costs between half and a million dollars to port to Linux. (Our application is very large, with millions of lines of code.)


    At $150 per copy, we'd need to sell between 3 and 6 thousand copies. Moreover, we'd have to front the half million or more before we finished and were able to collect the sales.


    It's possible that it'll be easier to do this once we finish our next generation Mac application, but we're still working on that.


    It's also a massive distraction. We'd need to hire Linux developers (which we've never done), and we'd have to buy new equipment, etc. We'd have to hire and train customer service reps on Linux. (It's easy to find call center staff with Windows or Mac experience. Linux tends to be used by technical people with technical jobs, not customer service.)


    And then this would have to be the single best selling product in our history (unlikely), and LInux users -- people who self identify as fans of "free software" -- would have to pay $150 to get it. If we made it free, like everyone would expect (the way our Windows engine is free), we'd have to sell MORE copies so we could pay book royalties and cover development costs.


    Sure, we could put it on pre-pub. We could put building a rocket ship on pre-pub to. As soon as we get pre-orders for $500 million we can start building the rocket. (I'm not being ridiculous -- you probably can build a private rocket for $500 million.) The problem is, it's unlikely we have or can get enough customers to make that work, and it would be a distraction in the meantime.


    At some point, if Linux continues to gain share on the desktop, we WILL survey our users on this, just as we did with the Mac. But at this point it seems like a waste of time.


    (I'd like to point out that the Mac has a number of Bible software packages, proving there's a paying market. There is no paying market for Linux Bible software right now that I can tell, and, in fact, the free projects don't seem to get much help.)


    Sorry!


    -- Bob

     

  • Nigel Cunningham
    Nigel Cunningham Member Posts: 181 ✭✭

    Hey Bob.

    The Linux projects don't get much love because you guys have such a vastly superior product. We go through the pain of buying Windows licenses and using VMware or whatever because we love YOUR product! We just want to give you the money, instead of Bill!

    (Yes, I'd happily pay $AU300 for a Linux version if I knew I wasn't going to be buying future releases of Windows and VMware).

  • DominicM
    DominicM Member Posts: 2,995 ✭✭✭

    Look Guys, I know you're passionate about this but Bob has give a logical reasoned current company position on this (which is far more than he needed to - he could have just said NO)

    Things change like they did with producing the Mac version, he  hasn't said never, he's saying not at present, there is always hope, if Linux use rises significantly I am sure Bob will reassess the product viability...

    I am sorry to say this thread saddens me as you keep on going on about it,  forgive me for saying it but you're now tantamount to harassing Bob as I read the forum.

    Bob I am also a linux user myself, but fully respect your decision, painful as it is, come on guys respect his decision, and if you feel its wrong, pray God changes his mind. 

     

    Never Deprive Anyone of Hope.. It Might Be ALL They Have

  • David J. Ring, Jr.
    David J. Ring, Jr. Member Posts: 146 ✭✭

    DominicM said:

    Look Guys, I know you're passionate about this but Bob has give a logical reasoned current company position on this (which is far more than he needed to - he could have just said NO)

    Things change like they did with producing the Mac version, he  hasn't said never, he's saying not at present, there is always hope, if Linux use rises significantly I am sure Bob will reassess the product viability...

    I am sorry to say this thread saddens me as you keep on going on about it,  forgive me for saying it but you're now tantamount to harassing Bob as I read the forum.

    Bob I am also a linux user myself, but fully respect your decision, painful as it is, come on guys respect his decision, and if you feel its wrong, pray God changes his mind.

    Dominic,

    The comments I have seen here are all praising Logos, and to be fair, any messages about this were in the sense of making sure that Bob understood what he could be missing.  I am fully satisfied with his later email, he fully explains his reasoning, and why.  I wasn't satisfied before that because I thought he somehow misunderstood the problem.  I'm totally satisfied that he understands now and his email shows it.

    Again, it was plain to me that others thought this too:  Perhaps he though that Linux users - given that there are over 5,000 available programs - somehow would not pay for an excellent program should it be offered.  Until his last answer - which he gave me privately and not through this forum (but which I posted) - I wasn't sure that he understood that Linux users are very enthusiastic - and the enthusiasm is mostly because Linux is an excellent system, with lots of available programs but that they are also people who would pay good money for excellence.  It is a very common misunderstanding, but Bob understands that we would gladly pay for excellence - which Logos offers, but it is just that he believes his companies resources would be best spent in other areas and that it would be difficult to find customer care people who understood the many varieties of Linux - a valid point as Debian is slightly different from even Ubuntu which is based on Debian!  It isn't an impossible problem, but it adds to the cost of producing such a program.

    Other posts have kindly offered suggestions which I believe were offered in a helpful manner and most certainly in a kind manner, for improvements.

    I'm absolutely certain that Mr. P takes these suggestions gladly and is thankful for them.  That's the type of man he is, of that I'm certain.

    Best wishes,

    DR

    David Ring

    -30-

  • jcc
    jcc Member Posts: 39 ✭✭

    It seems like the problem is that they are not writing code that is very cross-platform independent.  As this is observed by the current version of Logos relying so much on the MS libraries and tie into IE.  In fact, if they write code that was not so Microsoft dependent, libronix will probably would have worked fine in WINE and would not have cost them so much money to port it into the MAC platform.  And it's not just a matter of producing a linux version
    neither.  it would be ideal if they have portable code so that it can
    be ported to various mobile platforms as those are becoming more popular now.  Their web based solution seems to be a good step in that direction, however.  I hope that they can take some people (maybe people who posted in this thread) who are not so Windows and MAC centric to give them some feedback on what direction they can go given their resources with regard to their web based solution.

     

     

    But Bob's got a point, I think if we can go over and convince Bibleworks or Accordance to produce a linux version, Logos will probably take the linux option more seriously.  But right now, I don't think we can convince any of them to produce a linux version.  Having said that, I'd be willing to donate more than $150 for the cause.  (And we really have to say "donate" here, because that's more of the linux mentality--they are more than willing to donate than Mac/Win users to contribute to the spread the usage of linux--whether they want free software or not.

  • J.R. Miller
    J.R. Miller Member Posts: 3,566 ✭✭✭

    jcc said:

    In fact, if they write code that was not so Microsoft dependent, libronix will probably would have worked fine in WINE and would not have cost them so much money to port it into the MAC platform. 

    The Mac software was not/is not being "ported"  from the Windows version.  It is completely written for the Mac by Mac developers.  It would be easier to take these requests seriously (as you say), if the facts used in the argument were correct.

    My Books in Logos & FREE Training

  • jcc
    jcc Member Posts: 39 ✭✭
    I'm just using the same term that Bob used in his letter to David. In fact, if it was developed from scratch, it supports my point even more--that it was so Windows platform dependent that they couldn't even re-use the old code base and had to spent the money to develop it from scratch.
  • Steven Yu
    Steven Yu Member Posts: 212 ✭✭

    Anyone doing a test with ver4 under WINE or Codeweaver?

    "And you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free", John 8:32.
    "你們必定認識真理,真理必定使你們自由", 約翰福音 8:3.

  • TCBlack
    TCBlack Member Posts: 10,980 ✭✭✭

    Stephen,

    I had been trying to get it to install under Ubuntu/wine until my laptop gave out, so far no luck but I really didn't give it the attention I wanted to.

    My (weak) theory is that mono and moonlight could make it possible for the windows version to work under wine or codeweavers but so far no go.

    Hmm Sarcasm is my love language. Obviously I love you. 

  • Ross Durham
    Ross Durham Member Posts: 121 ✭✭

    Bob,

    What is the time frame for option D) you list above?  Thank you. 

     

    Ross

  • Seth A Georgson
    Seth A Georgson Member Posts: 2 ✭✭

    I am definitely a fan of Logos, and was in fact required to buy it as a seminary student.  However, I am getting pretty tired of running it through a virtual Windows XP (VirtualBox) on my Ubuntu machine. It slows down my computer significantly and is a pain to boot up.

    Yes, Linux users like free software.  Windows users also like free software; they're just more notorious for pirating programs they should be paying for.  Linux users are generally better at recognizing quality software, what kinds of things should be paid for and what kinds of things can be had for no cost. 

    I'm all about the Internet-based option, but I can tell you now that many places where I use Logos I don't have much for Internet. That would be even slower than my current option.

    I like your current philosophy of a free engine and paying for the books.  I can tell you that I would pay for more books if I had the convenience of using your software more conveniently.  Right now I only use Logos when I have to, which means I'm not going to buy more books for it when it's actually less time and hassle for me to get the physical book off my shelf.

  • J.R. Miller
    J.R. Miller Member Posts: 3,566 ✭✭✭

    I like your current philosophy of a free engine and paying for the books.  I can tell you that I would pay for more books if I had the convenience of using your software more conveniently.

    Well, it will cost at least 1 Million dollars to put Logos on Linux.  I somehow doubt you are buying that many books.

    My Books in Logos & FREE Training

  • George Somsel
    George Somsel Member Posts: 10,150 ✭✭✭

    I am definitely a fan of Logos, and was in fact required to buy it as a seminary student.  However, I am getting pretty tired of running it through a virtual Windows XP (VirtualBox) on my Ubuntu machine. It slows down my computer significantly and is a pain to boot up.

    Why don't you just get a Windows machine and use it as dedicated to Logos?  They're pretty cheap right now.  Perhaps you'd prefer to get a Commodore 64 and ask Logos to tailor their program for that? 

    george
    gfsomsel

    יְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן

  • Floyd  Johnson
    Floyd Johnson Member Posts: 4,002 ✭✭✭

    Why don't you just get a Windows machine and use it as dedicated to Logos?  They're pretty cheap right now.  Perhaps you'd prefer to get a Commodore 64 and ask Logos to tailor their program for that? 

    Hey, I have one.  Do you think they might do it? [:)]

    Blessings,

    Floyd

    Blessings,
    Floyd

    Pastor-Patrick.blogspot.com

  • J.R. Miller
    J.R. Miller Member Posts: 3,566 ✭✭✭

    Perhaps you'd prefer to get a Commodore 64 and ask Logos to tailor their program for that? 

    I wish Logos would support my Commodore 64.  We don't get any respect from software developers anymore.  Logos is mean.

    My Books in Logos & FREE Training

  • Floyd  Johnson
    Floyd Johnson Member Posts: 4,002 ✭✭✭

    That is three requests - don't you think that LOGOS should now be willing to give us what we really want!  

    Blessings,
    Floyd

    Pastor-Patrick.blogspot.com

  • George Somsel
    George Somsel Member Posts: 10,150 ✭✭✭


    Why don't you just get a Windows machine and use it as dedicated to Logos?  They're pretty cheap right now.  Perhaps you'd prefer to get a Commodore 64 and ask Logos to tailor their program for that? 

    Hey, I have one.  Do you think they might do it? Smile

    Blessings,

    Floyd


    At one time I worked for a machine shop as a bookkeeper using a Commodore -- not fun trying to do something with that.  I wrote a number of batch files to automate the process. How often are you willing to shuffle floppies?  Do they still sell 5¼" floppies?

    george
    gfsomsel

    יְמֵי־שְׁנוֹתֵינוּ בָהֶם שִׁבְעִים שָׁנָה וְאִם בִּגְבוּרֹת שְׁמוֹנִים שָׁנָה וְרָהְבָּם עָמָל וָאָוֶן

  • Todd Phillips
    Todd Phillips Member Posts: 6,736 ✭✭✭

    That is three requests - don't you think that LOGOS should now be willing to give us what we really want!  

    Dang, I knew I should have kept my C64 if Logos is going to be supporting it. It even had a dual floppy drive. I bet that would be required for Logos.

    MacBook Pro (2019), ThinkPad E540

  • TCBlack
    TCBlack Member Posts: 10,980 ✭✭✭

    Cassette Tape drive all the way!

    Load "logos4",8,1 <enter>

    Go drink a pot of coffee and raise some kids before coming back to check on it.

    Hmm Sarcasm is my love language. Obviously I love you. 

  • Donovan R. Palmer
    Donovan R. Palmer Member, MVP Posts: 2,886

    Cassette Tape drive all the way!

    Load "logos4",8,1 <enter>

    Go drink a pot of coffee and raise some kids before coming back to check on it.

    oh WOW, that brings back memories!!!

     

  • Floyd  Johnson
    Floyd Johnson Member Posts: 4,002 ✭✭✭

    Cassette Tape drive all the way!

    Load "logos4",8,1 <enter>

    Go drink a pot of coffee and raise some kids before coming back to check on it.

    Well, now we're talking - but make mine milk.

    Blessings,

    Floyd

     

    Blessings,
    Floyd

    Pastor-Patrick.blogspot.com

  • Joseph Holloway
    Joseph Holloway Member Posts: 2 ✭✭

    I came to this post due to a search for Linux after being wowed by the new Motorola phone and tablet XIOOM at the 2011 CES in Las Vegas. The Atrix is running a Linux based system when it is docked to the "laptop" docking station. As we keep looking to simplify our lives with less gadgets, this is a very promising platform. It is my hope this reply post is not on a stream that is too old to pay attention to. I have been looking at the iPad, and waiting for the gen 2. As the market expands, the offerings truly benefit us the consumer. As a pastor I cannot think of anything more promisingly beneficial than the Motorola platform for all my tech needs. I am waiting with baited breath to see how this shakes out. It is my hope it does so well and that LOGOS is on the cutting edge as always. I truly am a daily LOGOS user, and am making my decisions about my consumer needs based upon availability. Thank you for all your work, and I continue to look forward to a life-long relationship with LOGOS.

  • David J. Ring, Jr.
    David J. Ring, Jr. Member Posts: 146 ✭✭

    I guess the biggest problem is that for some reason Linux doesn't do encrypted media very well - but in Logos the media isn't encrypted.  It is the license key and that engine.  I see no reason why Logos programmers can't make that bulletproof.

    By the way Linux is bulletproof.  I never have problems with Ubuntu or Debian.  It runs for days and days and days without freezing up.  I can do everything I can with Windows and even more - except for borrowing audio books that have digital rights management on them.

    There is hope though, Logos is supposedly working on putting all our books on a remote computer and having any platform access them.  Hopefully this will also allow the remote missionary to get his books when he has Internet and to access them forever after.

    My other alternative is going Mac - which is also Unix based.  But if I bought Mac, I'd have less money to spend on books from Logos :-)

    David

  • Computer World has article about 11 Tablets to watch from CES 2011 http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9204258/CES_11_tablets_worth_watching, including Motorola's Xoom with Android 3.0 => http://www.computerworld.com/s/article/9203539/Update_Motorola_launches_Xoom_tablet_with_Android_3.0

    Logos is developing for Android => http://www.logos.com/mobile/android

    Found an article for running Android on Linux or Windows => http://www.howtogeek.com/howto/22665/run-android-on-your-netbook-or-desktop/


    C) The pre-pub already exists. At:

    http://www.codeweavers.com/compatibility/browse/name/?app_id=321

    you will find a pledging system for getting Logos Bible Software running under CrossOver. It's got 19 pledges at $1,793.90, and I'm pretty sure that I represent at least $500 of that. Get the pledges over $250,000 and we'll believe there's a viable market. And so will Codeweavers. You'll probably get it fast. :-)

    Almost 15 months later, pledges have increased to 21 with total of  $ 2,357.90 - appears Linux market lacks viability.

    With free virtualization (e.g. Oracle VirtualBox, VMWare Server) for Linux that can run Windows as a guest operating system (only need to obtain a valid Windows license that includes virtualization use).  Optionally, can custom install bare-bones Windows - only need stuff to run Logos 4.

    Logos subscription possibility: cloud based virtual Windows servers - remotely access Logos Library - maybe integrated with Proclaim.

    Keep Smiling [:)]

  • Mark
    Mark Member Posts: 2,662 ✭✭✭

    " rel="nofollow">Keep Smiling 4 Jesus :) said:

    Almost 15 months later, pledges have increased to 21 with total of  $ 2,357.90 - appears Linux market lacks viability.

    I have always been an advocate for Logos being on Linux but I have never made a pledge.  To be honest, I could not figure out the website until now and even now, while I know how to make a pledge, I dont know what I am making a pledge to.  I dont understand the technicalities of getting Logos on Linux.  I dont think it is wrong to ask and have this website Bob created, but the pledges there I would highly suspect does not represent the lack of a market.  It just represents the lack of desire to understand the technical difficulties of the project.

    Why not put the project on the community price page with a link to this original website?  And ask for pledges there?  Why not create a logos for Linux forum and see what develops from that?  I think the answers to these questions is simply due to the lack of interest LOGOS has in the project. And in the current user base, it is obvious that most do not use or care for linux.  It is an untapped market. 

    Logos should think about creating variations to their product:  A product for homeschoolers...one for women, one for singles, one for those only interested in accessing a library on their phone and one that is interested in a basic program that would run on Linux. Why not create a FREE BASIC PACKAGE consisting of a few Bibles, a few resources....that can be access simply by creating a free account?  Do you not think it wont bring in sales?

    A pledge?  I have already spent too much on Logos.  What does a pledge mean?  I already have Logos on windows.  If Logos for Linux was developed, I suppose I would have to repurchase the product...and that wont happen.  I wonder what would happen if I switched from a PC to an Apple...would I be required to purchase Logos for Apple?  I would not do it beyond some kind of small, token administrative fee to make the switch.  And the same with Linux.