BUG: Filtering by Edition no longer works as it should
Edition:e gives me eBooks
Edition:l gives me Logos books
But Edition:u no longer gives me User Created books, just an empty Library screen.
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
Comments
-
It is working for me… sorry! [:S]
macOS, iOS & iPadOS |Logs| Install
Choose Truth Over Tribe | Become a Joyful Outsider!0 -
A 10.6 bug then, perhaps?
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
Maybe. Can anyone on 10.6 confirm?
macOS, iOS & iPadOS |Logs| Install
Choose Truth Over Tribe | Become a Joyful Outsider!0 -
Bump
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
-
fgh said:
A 10.6 bug then, perhaps?
Tonya was unable to replicate on a 10.6 machine. Perhaps rebuilding your LIbraryCatalog would help. That being said I'd like to see logs. Can you log trying to do it, both successful and unsuccessful attempts?
0 -
Tommy Ball said:
Can you log trying to do it, both successful and unsuccessful attempts?
2783.Logos (kopia).log.zip (starting at 00.37)
Tommy Ball said:Perhaps rebuilding your LIbraryCatalog would help.
Doesn't that destroy the Last Updated column?
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
fgh said:
Doesn't that destroy the Last Updated column?
It shouldn’t. I rebuilt my entire index this week and it didn’t change anything on my machine.
Logos Series X Pastor’s Library | Logos 3 Leader’s Library | 4 Portfolio | 5 Platinum | 6 Feature Crossgrade | 7 Essential | 8 M & W Platinum and Academic Professional | 9 Academic Professional and Messianic Jewish Diamond
0 -
Scott E. Mahle said:
It shouldn’t. I rebuilt my entire index this week and it didn’t change anything on my machine.
I know indexing doesn't, but Tommy said 'LibraryCatalog', not 'LibraryIndex'.
Anyway, I now think it's the ResourceManager.db that holds the key to the Last Updated column.
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
Are you running the Swedish UI? If so, "user created" books will be indexed as "edition:Användarskapad".
(Arguably, we could index them under both the English and Swedish labels, so queries in either language work.)
0 -
-
Still having the same issue on RC1.
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
fgh said:
Edition:e gives me eBooks
Edition:l gives me Logos books
But Edition:u no longer gives me User Created books, just an empty Library screen.
Wonder what edition(s) appear when eBooks and Logos books are filtered:
edition:* -edition:(e,l)
Keep Smiling [:)]
0 -
Interesting (and smart) suggestion. It works! (after a looooong wait.) That must mean the Library Catalog is OK, mustn't it?
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
fgh said:
That must mean the Library Catalog is OK, mustn't it?
Yes plus what remains in the Editions column shows what can be filtered since entries beginning with e (book) and L (ogos) have been excluded.
Keep Smiling [:)]
0 -
edition:* -edition:(e,l)
Use this filter instead, it's instantaneous:
rating:>=0 -edition:(e,l)
fgh said:That must mean the Library Catalog is OK, mustn't it?
How about a screen shot of the edition column in the library with some user-created books showing?
MacBook Pro (2019), ThinkPad E540
0 -
[^o)]
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
fgh said:
Wonder if command:
rebuild personal book index
changes edition:u results in library ?
Also learned library filter:
rating:<6 -edition:(e,l)
has one less character to type for numeric comparison with rating to include all library resources.
Keep Smiling [:)]
0 -
Does edition:c work?
This is my personal Faithlife account. On 1 March 2022, I started working for Faithlife, and have a new 'official' user account. Posts on this account shouldn't be taken as official Faithlife views!
0 -
Mark Barnes said:
Does edition:c work?
Nope.
Wonder if command:
rebuild personal book index
changes edition:u results in library ?
Nope. (I think I tried that long ago, but I tried it again.)
rating:<6
Smart! And what a great example of how hard it is to think outside the box. Logos only has 0-5 ratings, so therefore it takes 3-4 years for someone to think of using '<6'. (At least I've never seen anyone use it before.)
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
-
0
-
You can force the Library Catalog Index to rebuild by changing a rating, adding a tag, renaming a title, etc. (It seems highly unlikely that you've never done this already at least once in the last few months, and that your Library Catalog Index hasn't been rebuilt recently, but I wanted to mention it, just in case.)
0 -
Bradley Grainger (Logos) said:
It seems highly unlikely that you've never done this already at least once in the last few months
You're quite right: extremely unlikely.[:D] I've probably added several hundred tags and ratings since this thread was started.
Isn't it very odd that rating:<6 -edition:(e,l) works, but edition:u doesn't?
Wait! I've got it! Since I don't use the Swedish UI, I pretty much ignored your post about it. Turns out I shouldn't have: edition:a works! It must read my language setting for the OS instead of the one for Logos. Nice coding.[:P] But you are beginning to make me very good at thinking outside the box.[:)]
(And now the forum .png bug hit again...)
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
fgh said:
Logos only has 0-5 ratings, so therefore it takes 3-4 years for someone to think of using '<6'.
You can only rate a resource in the range 1 through 5 but Logos allow us to use 0 for unrated resources (or ones whose rating we have Cleared).
rating:<6 is the same as rating:<=5
Dave
===Windows 11 & Android 13
0 -
Dave Hooton said:
rating:<6 is the same as rating:<=5
I know. I was just fascinated that it took so long before anyone thought of trying the shorter <6 instead of our usual >=0. To me that shows how hard it is to think outside the box. We believe we consider all options, but in reality a simple thing like the fact that 5 is the highest possible number of stars makes us overlook even such an obvious solution as <6.
(Mainly meant as a 'bump for Logos'.[:)])
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
Dave Hooton said:
rating:<6 is the same as rating:<=5
Yes, but it's fewer characters to type. KS4J is mindful of the lazy among us and his trick is appreciated.
0 -
Economy of expression. I like it. I'd be king of lazy if it didn't require any effort.
BTW, Wouldn't it be better if they just fixed this? Why can't we just say "-edition:(e,l)". Period. It can't be that difficult. Why the need for hacks? At least move the hacks in to the code, away from users.
0 -
Randy W. Sims (Shayne) said:
BTW, Wouldn't it be better if they just fixed this? Why can't we just say "-edition:(e,l)". Period. It can't be that difficult. Why the need for hacks? At least move the hacks in to the code, away from users.
Agreed. I've wished for a long time that we could use unary operations (- , ANDNOT) in the filter box without having to artificially construct a binary Boolean expression.
0 -
Now that I've solved the riddle for you, could you please write up a case for it, so that I don't have to bump it any more.
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
I am now able to reproduce the issue and will make a case. Thank you for the further details, fgh!
0 -
I haven't seen anything in the release notes, and there is no alert here or in my beta thread, but this is fixed in RC3.
Mac Pro (late 2013) OS 12.6.2
0 -
The case for this issue is still active, but apparently that was an oversight as there were several related issues fixed at the same time. This issue should be fixed in 5.1a.
0
said:
