Searching Lexham Hebrew Bible for Weqatal (waw plus perfect)

I was wondering if anyone else is able to get any results when doing a morphological search in the Lexham Hebrew Bible searching for the Weqatal form? It also seems that there has been a change (which I am grateful for!) in the names for the different verbal aspects/tenses in the LHB Hebrew morphology as compared to when Logos 5 first came out. I believe the "Qatal" was called "perfect" originally and at first there was no category for the weqatal. Now, when I look for obvious weqatal forms in the LHB and mouse over them (Like the verbs in 1 Sam 10:4) the are tagged as a waw conjunction with qatal tense/aspect rather than as a weqatal. Is anyone else experiencing this?

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Lee

I would be really interested to hear a clarification too. [:)]

David Thomas

I was wondering if anyone else is able to get any results when doing a morphological search in the Lexham Hebrew Bible searching for the Weqatal form? It also seems that there has been a change (which I am grateful for!) in the names for the different verbal aspects/tenses in the LHB Hebrew morphology as compared to when Logos 5 first came out. I believe the "Qatal" was called "perfect" originally and at first there was no category for the weqatal. Now, when I look for obvious weqatal forms in the LHB and mouse over them (Like the verbs in 1 Sam 10:4) the are tagged as a waw conjunction with qatal tense/aspect rather than as a weqatal. Is anyone else experiencing this?