Old NASB not a Bible any More?

Page 1 of 1 (11 items)
This post has 10 Replies | 1 Follower

Posts 2
preacherrocky | Forum Activity | Posted: Thu, Dec 24 2009 8:07 AM

Why doesn't my old New American Standard Version of the Bible show up as a Bible in the Logos4 Bible list?

Posts 3207
Tes | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, Dec 24 2009 9:04 AM

I think the new one is the best updated one ,

Blessings in Christ.

Posts 8660
TCBlack | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, Dec 24 2009 9:08 AM

What "type" is it listed as in the Library?

Hmm Sarcasm is my love language. Obviously I love you. 

Posts 9539
Forum MVP
Mark Smith | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, Dec 24 2009 9:09 AM

The question has been asked before and there has not been an answer from Logos that I can recall. We know that Logos no longer can distribute the older version of the NASB, but why that prevents them from updating it into L4 format for those who already have it or at least to change the tagging from Monograph to Bible is beyond me. Should have already been done, so it makes one wonder why it hasn't.

Pastor, North Park Baptist Church

Bridgeport, CT USA

Posts 9539
Forum MVP
Mark Smith | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, Dec 24 2009 9:10 AM

Thomas Black:
What "type" is it listed as in the Library?

Thomas, Rocky is asking about the 'old' NASB, not the NASB95.

Pastor, North Park Baptist Church

Bridgeport, CT USA

Posts 8660
TCBlack | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, Dec 24 2009 9:14 AM

Tes:

I think the new one is the best updated one ,

I agree Tes, but not everyone does.  It should be of Type:Bible, if it's not than it needs to go on the wiki metadata correction proposals list:

http://wiki.logos.com/Metadata_correction_proposals

Hmm Sarcasm is my love language. Obviously I love you. 

Posts 8660
TCBlack | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, Dec 24 2009 9:15 AM

Mark A. Smith:

Thomas Black:
What "type" is it listed as in the Library?

Thomas, Rocky is asking about the 'old' NASB, not the NASB95.

Yeah, I knew that.  I couldn't remember what had happened on the other threads with this one.

Hmm Sarcasm is my love language. Obviously I love you. 

Posts 9539
Forum MVP
Mark Smith | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, Dec 24 2009 9:22 AM

Thomas Black:
I couldn't remember what had happened on the other threads with this one.

My memory is fuzzy as well, esp. with relation to any Logos response.

Pastor, North Park Baptist Church

Bridgeport, CT USA

Posts 2759
DominicM | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, Dec 24 2009 11:05 AM

Logos respons was they were trying to get permission to do this from the publiseher, we all await with hope.

Never Deprive Anyone of Hope.. It Might Be ALL They Have

Posts 9539
Forum MVP
Mark Smith | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, Dec 24 2009 12:29 PM

DominicM:
Logos respons was they were trying to get permission to do this from the publiseher, we all await with hope.

As I said, I was fuzzy on this. Seems funny that they can tag it as a monograph but not tag it as a Bible. Either way they tagged it and I'll bet they didn't ask for permission to do so. Changing the tag shouldn't need the publisher's permission. Just curious to me.

Pastor, North Park Baptist Church

Bridgeport, CT USA

Posts 67
Brian Whalen | Forum Activity | Replied: Thu, Dec 24 2009 10:42 PM

There is definitely a diff between the 2 of those NASB versions, when I first got serious about Bible studying, I started with NASB due to its woody literalness.

Brian Whalen

http://www.mcnazarene.com

Page 1 of 1 (11 items) | RSS