ESV morphology changed from L3

Page 1 of 1 (5 items)
This post has 4 Replies | 3 Followers

Posts 54
Andrew Loney | Forum Activity | Posted: Sun, Dec 27 2009 5:39 PM

Am I correct that the morphology tagging system used in the NT of the ESV Reverse Interlinear of L4 is now Logos Morphology when in L3 it was Swanson Morphology? If so, why the change?

Posts 27241
Forum MVP
Dave Hooton | Forum Activity | Replied: Mon, Dec 28 2009 4:54 AM

Because Logos Morphology provides a consistent interace for compiling & searching the L4 Reverse Interlinears and Lexham interlinears. So if it was a switch from Swanson it was because Logos was heading that way with its Lexham products and NA27. Note that GRAMCORD morphology is not offered with any L4 product, but it is supported if you have an L3 product like NA27 w/GRAMCORD or the LXX.

Dave
===

Windows 10 & Android 8

Posts 4508
Robert Pavich | Forum Activity | Replied: Mon, Dec 28 2009 6:30 AM

Dave Hooton:
Note that GRAMCORD morphology is not offered with any L4 product, but it is supported if you have an L3 product like NA27 w/GRAMCORD or the LXX.

 

I never noticed!

You are one observant human!

Robert Pavich

For help go to the Wiki: http://wiki.logos.com/Table_of_Contents__

Posts 5337
Kevin Becker | Forum Activity | Replied: Mon, Dec 28 2009 7:30 AM

When you think about it a house morphology makes a lot of sense with the program being more tightly integrated with the multiple reverse interlinear. It allows us to have morph resources work together.

Also, I imagine the royalty and contractual terms of the Logos morphology are more attractive than the GRAMCORD morphology were.

Posts 27241
Forum MVP
Dave Hooton | Forum Activity | Replied: Mon, Dec 28 2009 3:29 PM

Robert Pavich:
You are one observant human!

Not quite... I observed/remembered Bob's comment from another thread!

Dave
===

Windows 10 & Android 8

Page 1 of 1 (5 items) | RSS