Am I correct that the morphology tagging system used in the NT of the ESV Reverse Interlinear of L4 is now Logos Morphology when in L3 it was Swanson Morphology? If so, why the change?
Because Logos Morphology provides a consistent interace for compiling & searching the L4 Reverse Interlinears and Lexham interlinears. So if it was a switch from Swanson it was because Logos was heading that way with its Lexham products and NA27. Note that GRAMCORD morphology is not offered with any L4 product, but it is supported if you have an L3 product like NA27 w/GRAMCORD or the LXX.
Note that GRAMCORD morphology is not offered with any L4 product, but it is supported if you have an L3 product like NA27 w/GRAMCORD or the LXX.
I never noticed!
You are one observant human!
When you think about it a house morphology makes a lot of sense with the program being more tightly integrated with the multiple reverse interlinear. It allows us to have morph resources work together.
Also, I imagine the royalty and contractual terms of the Logos morphology are more attractive than the GRAMCORD morphology were.
Not quite... I observed/remembered Bob's comment from another thread!
