Best syntax analysis of the Greek New Testament

I wondered if other users might be able to shed some light for me on the differences between the three syntax databases offered by Logos on the Greek New Testament. Of the three that follow, which has the best scholarly acceptance?

Cascadia Syntax Graphs
Opentext.org
Lexham Syntactic Greek New Testament

Thanks.

Find more posts tagged with

Comments

Dave Hooton

I can best illustrate as follows for Mark 9:20

PC = Primary Clause, P = Predicator (verbal element), S = Subject, A = Adjunct (modifying the Predicator), C = Complement (incl. direct/indirect Object)

Sn = Sentence, CL = Clause, V = Verbal Function, S = Subject Function, ADV = Adverbial Function, O = Object Function, conj = Conjunction,

vp = Phrase (verbal), pp = Phrase (prepositional), np= Phrase (nominal)

Seg Cl = Clause (segment type), Ptc Cl = Clause (participial), Prep Ph = Phrase (prepositional)

The Lexham is more about Sentence structure whilst Cascadia & OpenText are more about Word structure, with Cascadia providing more information e.g. distinguishing Indirect Object, Direct Object and Secondary Object.

MJ. Smith

Of the three that follow, which has the best scholarly acceptance?

I believe there are a number of syntax theories of similar scholarly acceptance - it depends on the language and your needs which syntax theory is most applicable.