-
No can do. Pretty bad in your screen copy. Bibles are set in your desktop ... how you prioritized, or a collection. While checking, I notice they coded the copy/highlight handles incorrectly. They literally float independent of text scrolling, when they get 'lose'.
-
It seems to be resource specific (outside long-pressing and copy to an external app). For example New Bible Atlas as an export choice, which pops up the same image and 2-finger zoomable. Other resources seem immune to zooming.
-
Hmmm ... I tried it, just pulling verbs. Then I clicked on the 'Send To' button (top-right) and chose passage list (which exports to Excel). But ... it looks like it's back to a full resource search ... sigh. Depending on how many you find, it's possible to simply copy what's in view (highlight and control c) ... not fun.
-
[quote user="Dave Hooton"]If you mean 'idols' which has an associative meaning of 'worthless', then LEB translates 17x as 'idols' and only 3x as 'worthless' (once in the context of an idol). Not sure about Leviticus (2x), but it is not used in Exodus. In general 'idols' is not used in Exodus and 4x in Lev.[/quote] Exactly. But per syntax pattern dating
-
I think we're struggling a little, since I'm not online, and older Logos. The steps below are just for completeness: 1. With your Abegg open, navigate to the first fragment you wanted, using the TOC (you did this). 2. Either on the first hebrew word (or even better, first verb ... your goal), right-click it - On the left column, choose the morph-selection
-
No ... you're setting up an example search-forward (since you can't search by fragment). After you start your example search, go up to the morph-search text-block, and edit it for the types of grammar you're after ... I think you're looking at verbs. Probably Dave is eating tomorrow's breakfast (Australia) ... chances are he can be considerably more
-
Sorry, I'm not so clear. Right click a specific word .... copy below from old L7 off-line (they switched sides in L8):
-
[quote user="MJ. Smith"]where it says "In Qumran Sectarian..." change that to the manuscripts you want.[/quote] I think the selectable fragments are only Biblical; not sectarian?
-
Right-click text at the start of a desired fragment .... highlight morph line ..... select search this resource (inline). Then after it starts searching, edit the morph search term. Painful, but doable.
-
Easiest is going to your sectarian 'start' and doing an inline on the morph-code. Then repeat for the next one. Troublesome but gets the job done.
-
[quote user="David Paul"]I have some misgivings about these Logos categorizations.[/quote] When Logos introduced 'sense', it necessarily entered the promise land of doctrine. In the same 'sense', BDAG is a theological dictionary through its doctrinal sense assignments. Further clouding this thread's issues, is when worthless-god (idol) enterred hebrew
-
So ... your DD is really important! We don't use any of them ... it was a given from the start, you make a trade (including the FL versions).
-
[quote user="Kyle G. Anderson"]This is related to how the publisher organized the entries[/quote] Ditto in CAD ... else the user is moving frustratingly between volumes (hardcopy).
-
You'd first need to narrow down to what mss's? Or a specific apparatus? Else it's like Abraham's stars (descendents) ... lots.
-
If you live in abject Logosian poverty, but have a sweet-tooth for Josephus greek volumes: https://www.logos.com/search?filters=author-1225_Author&ssi=0&sortBy=Relevance&limit=30&page=1&ownership=all&geographicAvailability=all The two inexpensive resourses listed above are from scholarship in the late 1800s ... a greek interlinear, and cross-references
-
[quote user="Robert Sussland"] Jerusalem is not in any layer. I zoomed out max, slowly, and Jerusalem was never there. [/quote] I don't doubt your points, but that resulting design seems hard to imagine ... it's as if they're designing onsy-twosy's, instead of the normal approach.
-
At that price, they should at least included english glosses. It's just embarassingly pricey. Just for comparison, the Philo interlinear (ok, glossless) is so much more affordable: https://www.logos.com/product/7865/the-works-of-philo-greek-text-with-morphology?ssi=0
-
First, I don't use Atlas ... I have my PB that points to all my maps, and organized by date and geography/subject. That said, and watching Atlas's long journey (I think 4th attempt by Logos), it sure looks like the 'layer' problem. Digital maps use layers, top ones being major cities/roads/features, while lower ones, more detail, plus underlying background
-
[quote user="Armin"]I heard and read numerous times that Jesus spoke more about hell than heaven. [/quote] Without regard to hard tagging, you'd have to look at your source(s) as to what they're discussing ... a good example, losing your soul.
-
[quote user="Bruce Dunning"]I sort by date by changing the resource title.[/quote] Ditto, but I remember KSFJ has a good system. I also push back dating to the older languages (eg latin, coptic, syriac, etc) even though the equivalent english translation is more recent.