-
[quote user="Dave Hooton"] [quote user="MJ. Smith"]And you are still including non-canonical quotations which do occur in the NT[/quote] Are you saying that the NT results are non-canonical quotations? [/quote] No, I am saying that the NT includes non-canonical quotations. Therefore, it the search does no screen them out, the user needs to review the
-
Also remember that for links of interest that Faithlife does not make, the Community Tagging options allows the user to add the tags.
-
Drats. Thanks for the help ... I guess I wasn't confused so much as unwilling to accept the results of my thought.
-
And you are still including non-canonical quotations which do occur in the NT
-
Using the criteria that they have study or discussion questions and are in my library: Bible study guides Bibliography (2) Nystrom, Carolyn. 1 & 2 Kings: God’s Imperfect Servants: 10 Studies for Individuals or Groups. A LifeGuide Bible Study. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Connect: An Imprint of InterVarsity Press, 2018. Wright, Tom, Dale Larsen,
-
Where I am getting myself confused is not the NT use of the OT but the non-canonical texts [quote] Structure Each Intertext label includes some combination of the following attributes: • Relationship: The intertextual relationship between the canonical and noncanonical references. • Citation: An explicit reference to scripture with a citation
-
Did I miss it?
-
Docx files for personal book: Verbum 9 part 1 ; Verbum 9 part 2 ; Verbum 9 part 3 ; How to use the Verbum Lectionary and Missal ; Verbum 8 tips 1-30 ; Verbum 8 tips 31-49 Please be generous with your additional details, corrections, suggestions, and other feedback. This is being built in a .docx file for a PBB which will be shared periodically. Previous
-
get it on FeedBear (faithlife.com) and drum up votes
-
Yes, that is exactly what I did ... when I say Ge-Rv the only relevant question is ecumenical or Catholic (occasionally Lutheran or Anglican) but I never mean the truncated Reformed/"Protestant" canon as the only reason I ever have to use it is to test something for a forum question. I will mutter to myself at times that I should be offered the Coptic
-
[quote user="Mark Manderson"]2) Ability to "click" on a Strong's Numbers reference within the Bible I was reading.[/quote] I am not a user of Strongs but when it is displayed as an interlinear you can just click on it. Or if you have the information tool open, you can open Strongs from there.
-
[quote user="Daniel Kyle"] Please forgive my frustration as I forgive those that frustrate me. [/quote] Don't forget you can push for different/added behavior on FeedBear (faithlife.com) FL has ended up doing what it said it wouldn't in the face of user pressure.
-
[quote user="SineNomine"]I am very alert to the fact that they are different things... but the (normal?) user writes "demon" or "demons" in Factbook and expects to learn about demons . All three of those articles are "about demons".[/quote] Several years ago when FL screwed their data (language intentional although I understand why FL did it and recognize
-
Okay using your example, this worked {Label Intertext WHERE Target ~ <Bible Ge-Rv>} ... I was going awry on letting relationships default. Thank you.
-
Not quite: I don't care what the source is - non-Biblical texts need to be included - in fact I want to exclude the source records I want to require that target be specified and be Biblical - preferably Catholic canon rather than my usual ecumenical canon
-
In an Intertext label search, I only want labels that specify a target. I do not want labels that specify a source. Put another way I only want the quotation ... not the original source. Usually, "any value" is handled by omitting the attribute - which doesn't work in this case. HELP
-
[quote user="Sean Boisen"]Many pages have a See Also section now: some are already crowded[/quote] Yes, but when do we get the Senses section back in the Biblical Entity pages? I prefer more complete pages to more skeletons.
-
I didn't purchase it last night. It has now been hidden ...
-
[quote user="Jeff Frazier"]So, "ebook" in Logospeak means doesn't work right yet?[/quote] No, it means that it has minimal, automated tagging and therefore does not support features that require additional FL tagging. Different resources take different types of tagging with different amounts of automated vs. manual effort. Therefore, when the resources
-
[quote user="Jeff Frazier"]CS told me the issue is known, and Logos has no intentions of fixing it. [/quote] Sorry to be rude but I don't believe you. As was said by a Faithlife employee above, it has not yet been fully converted.